Poker News

Vanessa Rousso Bests Tough Field in 2010 PCA $1,000 Ladies Event

Harrison "gibler123" Gimbel may have garnered the headlines at the 2010 PokerStars Caribbean Adventure (PCA) by winning the Main Event and a $2.2 million paycheck, but he wasn't the only one having a good time at the Atlantis Resort and Casino in the Bahamas.  One of the biggest hits of the Caribbean poker festival was the $1,000 + $100 Ladies No Limit Hold'em tournament.

A total of 91 women competed in the event, 33 of whom won their seats online at PokerStars via satellites with buy-ins starting as low as $2.20.  They won more than just their entry and spending money; the online qualifiers were also pampered at the resort's Mandara Spa and received instruction at a High Heels Poker Tour Ladies Boot Camp session from Team PokerStars Pro Vanessa Rousso.

As it turned out, the Boot Camp attendees probably should have listened to their instructor more closely, as Rousso went on to win the event, scoring a $24,725 cash.  Rousso burst onto the poker scene in 2006 when she placed 7th in the $25,000 World Poker Tour (WPT) Championship and then won a $5,000 No Limit Hold'em event at the WPT Borgata Poker Open a few months later.  In 2007, she finished second in PokerStars World Championship of Online Poker (WCOOP), winning over $700,000, and became known to a broad television audience when she was the runner-up in the 2009 National Heads-Up Poker Championship.  The GoDaddy.com girl has also won two tournaments on NBC's "Poker After Dark."

Other members of Team PokerStars Pro in the tournament who were not as fortunate were Katja Thater, Veronica Dabul, Sandra Naujoks, and Maria "Maridu" Mayrinck.  Other known pros in attendance included J.J. Liu, 2007 World Series of Poker (WSOP) Europe Main Event champ Annette Obrestad, European Poker Tour (EPT) London Ladies champ Dagmara Aleksandrowicz, and Shirley Rosario, who placed fourth.

Another player of note was Elizabeth Bennett-Martin, who qualified for the Main Event via a PokerStars satellite for the second year in a row.  A portion of her winnings was earmarked for the charitable organization Cambodian Legal Education for Women (CLEW).  Created by her Toronto law firm, Bennett Gastle P.C., CLEW raises money to help impoverished women in Cambodia attend law school.  The goal of these women is to provide legal help to those who would not normally be able to access any in Cambodia, where the population of more than 14 million has only 538 lawyers.  Unfortunately, Bennett-Martin did not make the money in any event this year.

Sixteen women did cash, though, each getting a piece of the $88,270 prize pool.  Runner-up Halli Pinson was impressed with the field, telling PokerStars, "This event was a lot more serious than most ladies tournaments. I didn't recognize that many faces, but the field seemed a lot more experienced than usual. These women had come to play, and they had come to win! Vanessa Rousso dominated the event though – she had good cards and she's an experienced player: the combination was lethal."

Those who did not want to pony up $1,100, but still wanted to compete in a women-only tournament, or those who just wanted another shot at a title, had the chance to play in another Ladies Event the next day for just $300.  The field of 73 produced a prize pool of $19,119 and Diana Linke took home the top cash of $6,504.

PokerStars Caribbean Adventure $1,000 + $100 Ladies Event Final Standings

1. Vanessa Rousso - $24,275
2. Halli Pinson - $13,815
3. Ann-Margaret Johnston - $9,335
4. Shirley Rosario - $6,620
5. Jamie Kerstetter - $5,740
6. Pastora Sorenson - $4,635
7. Lisa Adams - $3,750
8. Vanessa Caldeira - $2,870
9. Irene Baroni - $2,425
10. Sarah Wasch - $2,425
11. Violetta Szczerba - $2,205
12. Nesrine Kourdourli - $2,205
13. Muriel Allard - $1,985
14. Anna Yamshchikova - $1,985
15. Alina Salnikova - $1,765
16. Hai Nguyen - $1,765

Mohsin Charania (chicagocards1) Interview with Poker News Daily

Poker News Daily: How did you get into poker?

Mohsin Charania: I never saw “Rounders.”  I never saw poker on television.  I was a junior in college [at the University of Illinois] and I went over to one of my friend’s places.  He was going to play poker at a home game in a dorm room and I was bored, so went with him.  That is literally what happened.  I met Ravi “govshark2” Raghaven and some other people. I started playing $0.10/$0.25 and $0.25/$0.50 with them once or twice a week.  Then, we started going every day making money and paying rent off these rich kids.

PND: You were paying rent off of a $0.25/$0.50 poker game?

Mohsin Charania: Well, we would play $0.10/$0.25 and buy in for $20 or $25 and there would be eight of us.  There’d be $250 worth of buy-ins on the table and everyone would bust, so there would be $500 on the table.  We’d be five- or six-handed and up it to $0.25/$0.50, then $1/$2, and then at some point, there would be two or three people who cashed out.  Eight people would never cash out.

Then, I started playing $1/$2 with Faraz “The-Toliet” Jaka and Andy “BKiCe” Seth at this thing called The Poker House.  At the time, I thought Jaka was some super-aggressive monkey, but then I figured out he was actually really good at poker.  I don’t know, I just went to the home game and played.

PND: When did you start playing outside of the home games around campus?

Mohsin Charania: I turned 21, went to the casino, made a couple thousand dollars, and felt super excited.  You don’t want to know how I lost $200,000 in my first three months playing poker, do you?

PND: Of course we do.

Mohsin Charania: That was in January of my junior year I think, 2006.  That summer, I had a couple thousand dollar bankroll from the home game, went to the casino, and built it up to $10,000.  I met this Asian kid at the home game who took me to Las Vegas for a week.  I had $10,000, played $2/$5, and grinded it up to $20,000.  Then, I played $5/$10 and grinded it up to $40,000 and then played $10/$20 and got it up to $100,000.  Then, I started playing $25/$50 and $50/$100.

PND: You did all of this in the span of a week?

Mohsin Charania: No, we kept extending our flights because we were making so much money, so it was more like two weeks.  After two weeks, I’d run a couple grand up to $180,000.  Then, I lost two $100,000 pots and that was the first time ever that I was super tilted.  I lost all the rest of the money.  I had to use my mom’s debit card to fly home.  Then, I got a credit card under my name because I was 21, deposited on Bodog, and won the site’s $100,000 Guaranteed.  I got really lucky, I deposited $500, won that tournament, and then got third in it the next week.

PND: So you didn’t start playing online until after that ill-fated Vegas trip?

Mohsin Charania: Yeah.  I was a live pro.  I remember the pots I lost.  I was sitting there with bundles of cash in front of me and I got it all-in with K-Q on an A-J-10 board.  I remember telling the kid I had a straight and I was willing to take the pot right now.  He said, “I’ll gamble with you,” and called with a set of jacks; the board paired on the turn.

PND: Were you playing $50/$100 with people you know?

Mohsin Charania: It was Brad Booth, Kenny Tran, and Mimi Tran.  I want to say Jaka was there also, but I don’t know if he was in the game.  I was crushing the game because I was running so good.  I won a $50,000 pot when I had aces to kings.

PND: Did that trip teach you the importance of bankroll management?

Mohsin Charania: Well, I don’t really play cash games anymore.  I play tournaments now.  Online cash games are too hard.  I used to play a lot of $5/$10 and $10/$20 on PokerStars.  Two summers ago, I made $80,000 playing cash games on PokerStars, but then I started running really bad.  I didn’t have the roll to play $10/$20 and I can’t play $5/$10 disciplined.

PND: Would you say online cash games are the toughest form of poker around right now?

Mohsin Charania: Oh yeah.  They’re unbeatable.  PokerStars $2/$4 - you have to be really good to beat that.

PND: You put off law school at Northwestern University to play full-time.  When do you plan on going back?

Mohsin Charania: If I continue to struggle the way I have the past couple of months, I’ll go back.

PND: Do you like the idea of being a lawyer as much as being a poker player?

Mohsin Charania: Yeah, I hate being a poker player.  Poker playing is very bipolar.  I love it when I’m winning, but it is absolutely the worst feeling in the world when I’m losing.  If you asked me the same question last January or February when I was crushing, I would have told you I was never going back.

New Defendants in Kentucky Internet Gambling Case Remain Unknown

Following a chain of e-mails sent last week by attorneys for the Commonwealth of Kentucky, the names of additional defendants in the state’s legal action against the owners of 141 internet gambling domain names remain a mystery.

In October, the Kentucky Supreme Court heard the case, which pits industry organizations like the Interactive Media Entertainment and Gaming Association (iMEGA) and the Interactive Gaming Council (IGC) against the Kentucky Justice and Public Safety Cabinet, led by Secretary J. Michael Brown. Despite a ruling by the state’s highest judicial body potentially being handed down any day now, Kentucky attorneys filed a motion to add parties to its complaint last week. How the latest filing will affect the Kentucky Supreme Court’s decision, if at all, remains unknown. The additional parties in question were U.S. citizens and companies engaged in internet gambling.

When lawyers for iMEGA tried to obtain a list of the additional names, counsel for the Commonwealth turned them down. iMEGA Chairman Joe Brennan told Poker News Daily, “They've basically said that they don't recognize our standing. They're just ignoring what happened in the Court of Appeals, which confirmed our standing.” In a chain of e-mails between opposing attorneys available on iMEGA’s website, William Hurt of Kentucky counsel Hurt, Crosbie, and May states, “I do not believe anyone has standing to file a response or motion to strike.”

Brennan lashed out at the State’s attorneys, who are purportedly working on a contingency basis, as part of a press release sent on Monday: “They were counting on a big payday from our members in the form of settlements to get their own property back, but it doesn’t look like that’s going to happen. Since they don’t get one nickel from the state to pursue this, it’s clear that the drive for big money has taken over and any sense of fair play or due process has gone out the window.”

The 141 internet gambling domain names in question include those belonging to online poker giants like PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker. If the Commonwealth of Kentucky were successful, these domains would be inaccessible not just in the southern state, but also around the world. The domains were seized back in September of 2008 on the grounds that they constituted “gambling devices,” a term that traditionally refers to tangible objects like slot machines and roulette wheels that you’d find in an underground casino.

In January, the Kentucky Court of Appeals ruled by a two-to-one margin that the Commonwealth did not have jurisdiction to act, setting up an appeal by the State to its Supreme Court. iMEGA attorney Jon Fleischaker noted in an e-mail, “The Court of Appeals ruled that we had standing in this case, and by implication, a right to intervene. I believe the Supreme Court is likely to rule the same thing.” Hurt retorted that the State would “object to anything that you file, but will nonetheless continue to send you notice.”

Brennan told Poker News Daily that Circuit Court judge Thomas Wingate did not act on the motion to add names filed by Kentucky’s attorneys last week and the next day that it can be considered is January 21st. The motion calls for a hearing on January 20th in front of Judge Wingate, although its future appears to be in doubt. Judge Wingate upheld the State’s actions as part of an October 2008 decision.

The Kentucky Supreme Court has given no indication as to when it will hand down a ruling. As it currently stands, the Kentucky Supreme Court does not have any oral arguments scheduled on its calendar until January 13th. However, Brennan expected a decision from the Kentucky Supreme Court to be issued in January.

Full Tilt Poker Bot Lawsuit Focuses on Attorney Background

While several litigations against Full Tilt Poker appear to be resolved or dead in the water, the online poker room is still not in the clear when it comes to a lawsuit accusing the site of unfairly seizing player funds, using bots on the site, and racketeering.

Poker News Daily first reported the story of Lary “pokergirl z” Kennedy in early October.  The gist of her rather complicated case is that Kennedy was accused of using a bot by another player on the site who was also a frequent poster in the TwoPlusTwo poker forum.  As a result of those accusations and Kennedy’s own admittance that she used another player’s account when her own screen name wasn’t eliciting enough action, the site seized the funds in her account, which amounted to just over $80,000.

After a long period of communication with Full Tilt, Kennedy decided that her best course of action was to file suit against not only the company, but also several individuals involved with Full Tilt, including Raymond Bitar, Howard Lederer, Andy Bloch, John Juanda, Chris Ferguson, Perry Friedman, and Patrik Antonius, just to name a few.  While the crux of the complaint centers on Kennedy’s alleged mistreatment by the site, it also levels numerous charges against two companies involved with Full Tilt, Vert Enterprises and Tiltware.  The charges in the suit include fraud, libel, slander, false advertising, and somewhat surprisingly, racketeering.

The invocation of the Racketeer-Influenced Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act stemmed from what Kennedy and co-plaintiff Greg Omotoy claimed were hundreds of illegal gambling transactions.  While most typically associate the RICO Act with mobsters and gangs, it is actually common when it comes to civil suits, as those affected by RICO are able to receive three times the amount of damages they would otherwise have gotten.

Nonetheless, the accusations, which include claims that Ferguson and Bloch created and implemented bots used on the Full Tilt site, has raised a few eyebrows regarding its legal merit.  Full Tilt, which is notorious for keeping mum in legal situations, spoke out against the suit, calling it “baseless” and “frivolous.”

Kennedy’s official website documenting the case shows no new information as of late and most of the attention following the announcement of the suit has been directed at her counsel, Cyrus Sanai.  The UCLA Law School graduate has been in the news before for another internet-related matter, a case involving California Judge Alex Kosinski.  In mid-2008, Sanai uncovered a number of lewd photographs on the sub-directory of a personal website belonging to Kosinski and filed a disciplinary complaint against the judge, who was in the midst of a high-profile pornography trial.  Some legal blogs like Overlawyered and Patterico have suggested that Sanai has a less-than-stellar reputation in some corners of the California legal community.

When Pokerati posted a story chronicling some of Sanai’s actions over the past couple of years, a commenter purporting to be Sanai posted rebuttals to the criticisms and directed the focus back to the case itself.  The comments stated that he tried repeatedly to resolve the matter with Full Tilt representatives and even sat down for a mediation session that failed to produce any results.  Within the comments, Sanai also expressed interest in learning more about other cases in which the site seized customer funds.

These sentiments are echoed on Kennedy’s personal site as well, which encourages anyone with a similar story to contact Sanai, who would consider taking on new clients on a contingency basis.

Online Poker Tournament Recap for November 30th

Brazilian online poker pro Caio Cesar “caio_pimenta” Pimenta was the big winner on the virtual felts Sunday with his victory in the PokerStars Sunday Million, the site’s weekly flagship event. Pimenta outlasted a field of 9,077 players to claim a prize of $259,243.98, the 19-year-old’s largest online score to date.

PokerStars trumped every other site on Sunday with its $1,815,400 prize pool in the Sunday Million. Joining Pimenta at the final table was Team PokerStars Pro member Johnny Lodden, who ultimately took fifth for $72,616.00 after his A-K couldn’t catch up to the pocket kings of Pimenta. The Brazilian pro began the final table with the chip lead and went wire-to-wire, scooping the final pot of the tournament when he made a full house against runner-up KillerMendez.

Several other online pros had success on PokerStars on Sunday. Anthony “holdplz” Spinella took down the Sunday Second Chance after besting a loaded final table that included Michael “anakinso” Goodman, Bryan “Squirrely1″ Sapp, Adam “akat11″ Katz, and Walter “JLizard” Wright. Spinella earned $49,613.12 for his efforts. Laurence “rivermanl” Houghton headlined the final table of the Sunday Warm-Up and took fourth place for $52,296.40. Joe “floes” Serock also made that final table, collecting $11,570 for his eighth place finish.

On Full Tilt Poker, “WooohSaaah” was the winner of the $750,000 Guaranteed, earning $154,233.71. Michael “Pot Odds 3” McNeil took eighth in the event for $15,721.20. In the Sunday Brawl, mikkelstrack walked away with $96,010.22 after defeating a field of 2,794 players and a final table that included Carder “SpazIsPlusEV” England (fourth place for $40,792.40) and Andy “BKiCe” Seth (sixth place for $18,999.20).

Here’s a look at the results from Sunday’s major online tournaments:

PokerStars Sunday Million
$215 buy-in, 9,077 entrants

1st: Caio Cesar “caio_pimenta” Pimenta – $259,243.98
2nd: KillerMendez – $164,562.50
3rd: floriverboy – $135,156.53
4th: joaoMathias – $90,770.00
5th: Johnny “johnnylodden” Lodden – $72,616.00
6th: buddahead9 – $54,462.00
7th: LAPINKY – $36,308.00
8th: BRzRoll – $19,969.40
9th: bo0ort – $12,707.80

Full Tilt Poker $750,000 Guaranteed
$216 buy-in, 4,367 entrants

1st: WooohSaaah – $154,233.71
2nd: Hand Banana7 – $93,366.46
3rd: Beat Man – $61,138.00
4th: jesseja77 – $48,037.00
5th: city17 – $36,071.42
6th: sweepybreedy – $26,726.04
7th: based – $20,088.20
8th: Michael “Pot Odds 3” McNeil – $15,721.20
9th: I use 5cards – $11,703.56

PokerStars Sunday Warm-Up
$215 buy-in, 4,628 entrants

1st: Mr. Shanish – $116,468.22
2nd: angevert – $106,468.22
3rd: $saxo$ – $106,468.22
4th: Laurence “rivermanl” Houghton – $52,296.40
5th: cspdealer – $39,338.00
6th: CruSader1981 – $30,082.00
7th: Bahneyyy – $20,826.00
8th: Joe “floes” Serock – $11,570.00
9th: melano26 – $7,404.80

Full Tilt Poker Sunday Brawl
$256 buy-in, 2,794 entrants

1st: mikkelstrack – $96,010.22
2nd: YrrsiNN – $72,201.87
3rd: Snusarn1 – $72,630.71
4th: Carder “SpazIsPlusEV” England – $40,792.40
5th: Jotagran49 – $28,498.80
6th: Andy “BKiCe” Seth – $18,999.20
7th: PrishChips31 – $12,852.40
8th: uzzyking – $8,940.80
9th: dadoudinet – $6,705.60

PokerStars Sunday 500
$530 buy-in, 1,033 entrants

1st: liutas.a – $89,147.90
2nd: Blue Knight1 – $64,562.50
3rd: SENORSEXY – $49,067.50
4th: Jeremy “JBurleson” Burleson – $35,948.40
5th: Jason “Taknapotin” Somerville – $25,566.75
6th: Jason “JERRRY” Glass – $20,401.75
7th: aylinka18 – $15,236.75
8th: EMakers9186 – $10,071.75
9th: hitthehole – $5,681.50

Cake Poker $250,000 Guaranteed
$268 buy-in, 1,286 entrants

1st: PIIIGEEEOOON – $63,607
2nd: thepokerkinq – $44,654
3rd: LawyerDad – $29,812
4th: IL LAUREATO – $22,038
5th: paulgees822 – $14,906
6th: xfaithlessx – $11,276
7th: SomeDumGuy – $8,256
8th: Kakakahahaha – $6,168
9th: iamchainsaw – $5,204

PokerStars Sunday Second Chance
$215 buy-in, 1,366 entrants

1st: Anthony “holdplz” Spinella – $49,613.12
2nd: Bryan “Squirrely1” Sapp – $36,062.40
3rd: Adam “akat11” Katz – $27,320.00
4th: parksy1066 – $20,490.00
5th: bbs99 – $14,343.00
6th: Michael “anakinso” Goodman – $11,611.00
7th: The Mooks – $8,879.00
8th: SPOTLIGHT19 – $6,147.00
9th: Walter “JLizard” Wright – $3,824.80

UB.com $200,000 Guaranteed
$215 buy-in, 1,054 entrants

1st: Ben “XTHESTEINX” Zamani – $39,267.00
2nd: 99NVRLOSEZ – $35,945.00
3rd: Adam “AKAT11” Katz – $19,077.40
4th: CHIPMICK09 – $13,596.60
5th: JMEWNIE – $11,488.60
6th: ILIKEPONIES – $9,380.60
7th: BAZOOKA87 – $7,272.60
8th: ANIMAL5050 – $5,164.60
9th: Nick “SHIPKINS” Grippo – $3,583.60

An Inconvenient Truth of the Poker Industry

With the upcoming Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen next week, the topic of the environment has never been hotter.

The common assumption is poker players know how to protect a stack of chips and think of little else, let alone the environment.

In most cases, that may be not far from the truth, but should it be?

With the growing threat of global warming and climate change, poker players are not exempt from having to care about the environmental consequences of their actions.

And if you’ve ever been around a major poker tournament, you know the poker community has room to move when it comes to reducing its environmental impact.

The Big Picture

With hundreds of major tournaments around the world, the poker industry is a prominent offender when it comes to greenhouse gas emissions.

Perhaps no more than any other travel or sports industry, but between flights, rental cars and straight-up energy consumption in casinos around the world, it’s safe to say there’s a surprising volume of negative environmental issues involved with simply playing cards.

Poker tournaments generate a large amount of waste. Disposable plates, food wrappers, cigarette butts, soda and water bottles are just the beginning.

Combine this with a lack of proper recycling programs in Las Vegas and most casinos around the world, and the landfills get a little larger with every one.

Of course, bringing a few thousand people to one location for any big event will likely create a similar amount of waste.

But that’s no excuse for poker players, according to Kristen Ostling, Communications Specialist in Climate Change for the world-renowned David Suzuki Foundation.

“This is the way of the future and not just for individuals,” said Ostling. “Businesses, organizations and individuals should all be looking at ways to reduce their carbon output. It’s also good for the bottom line in terms of dollars in most cases.”

Airline flights are among the fastest growing sources of global warming gases and air travel is a necessary evil on the world’s poker tours.

EPT Prague drew 555 players in 2007, but fewer than 20 actually resided in the Czech Republic. 

Even if every player were to fly from relatively close Barcelona, Spain to the event, almost 150 tons of carbon dioxide would be created.

Long-haul flights are one of the worst violators in terms of carbon emissions and a trip to Melbourne, Australia from North America for the Aussie Millions could conceivably use up an entire year of sustainable per-person emissions in just one flight.

“From a green perspective it’s good to do things online, but obviously sometimes you can’t beat face-to-face interaction,” Ostling said.  “The first thing a business has to do is make an assessment of what kind of environmental impact they are having.”

One suggestion Ostling has for the jet setting poker player is to buy carbon offsets to lessen the impact.

A carbon offset is essentially a certificate that represents a reduction of carbon emissions. Concerned individuals can buy a wide-variety of carbon offsets ranging from solar-power generators in India to reforestation or tree-planting in Ecuador.

Organizations like the World Wildlife Fund and the David Suzuki Foundation offer comprehensive guides on buying carbon offsets and buying enough could make it possible for even a well-travelled poker pro to achieve carbon neutrality.

The View from the Poker Industry

It’s impossible to consider the environmental impact of the poker industry and not start with Las Vegas.

Vegas is the Mecca of the poker world and a flashy, 24-hour city in the desert is obviously a hard sell when it comes to environmental sustainability.

A number of studies have ranked Nevada near the bottom of environmentally conscious states, and water consumption always seems to be a hot topic.

In 2008, environmental blog Treehugger ran a story claiming the Las Vegas strip could run dry by 2021 citing a recent study by the Scripps Institution of Oceanography estimating there is a 50% chance the city will run out of water if no significant cutbacks are made.

Combine water consumption with the sheer amount of electricity it takes to run the Strip and you’re looking at a city that’s universally frowned upon by environmentalists.

Despite the bad reputation, there have been some efforts in Las Vegas to go greener.

In 2009, Harrah’s announced it was joining Dell, Starbucks and Wrigley as founding members of the Team Earth initiative aiming to unite businesses, non-profits, scientists, educators and individuals to address pressing environmental issues.

In 2008, Harrah’s also began offering carbon offsets to its customers to help reduce the environmental impact of taking a Las Vegas vacation.

Plus, the massive 16,797,000-square-foot CityCenter development, set to finally open its doors this winter, appears to be going green.

Despite the considerable environmental impact of such a large casino, hotel, retail and residential project, the development was recently given a gold rating by the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design rating system developed by the U.S. Green Building Council.

CityCenter will use reclaimed water, an onsite power plant and other green technologies that are estimated to save the equivalent of 7,700 homes worth of energy, making it one of the largest sustainable developments in history.

There are also a few businesses trying to carve out a niche in the poker world with eco-friendly poker products.

Eric Hansel runs EGM Green, which he jokingly refers to as the only “green” company in poker. His company produces a variety of environmentally-conscious gambling products including poker tables, craps tables and lounge furniture.

Each table is made with 96-97% naturally sustainable materials and 100% post-industry recycled synthetic fiber. Harrah’s allowed EGM Green display one of its tables at the 2008 WSOP to mixed reactions.

“I think the macro view is that poker players don’t care about the environment, but there are some that do,” he said.  “It’s steadily been getting better over the last two years. We keep letting players know they don’t have to give up luxury to buy a green poker table.”

Earlier this year, the company won an International Gaming Award for being the most eco-friendly in the industry.

“Sustainability will change the way casinos run,” Hansel said. “There’s no way the casinos of 10 years ago can operate 10 years from now.”

The View from the Players

Contrary to popular opinion, it’s not all $1,000-bottles-of-Cristal ballers and high-stakes prima donnas blowing through money in the poker world.

Several noted poker pros are personally involved in environmental work.

Full Tilt pro David Singer, a WSOP bracelet winner, had a brief career as a lawyer at a non-profit environmental organization before getting into poker.

“I sometimes joke that I was going to save the world, but now I take people’s money,” said Singer.

Considering the self-serving nature of the game, it’s easy to see why some players are naturally apathetic to causes like the environment. But Singer said the poker world isn’t that different from the general public.

“I think poker players run the gamut of being concerned about global warming to not really caring about it,” he said. “Yesterday I was in Bobby’s Room and I overheard Prahlad Friedman telling Daniel Negreanu that golf courses are generally bad for the environment. At least they were talking about it in a positive way and voicing their concerns.”

But the week before, Singer said there was also a guy in Bobby’s Room who didn’t understand why Al Gore had received the Nobel Peace Prize for his environmental work.

However, Singer believes poker players can help the environmental cause.

“Poker players bring a unique perspective because they are good at strategizing and environmental organizations can always use volunteers to help plan campaigns,” he said. “There are also some poker players who are lucky and have a decent amount of money and donating to these organizations is always helpful.”

Singer agreed carbon offsets can be a viable option for the jet set and that volunteering for environmental groups is almost always a good idea.

Fellow Full Tilt pro Amanda Baker is heavily involved with wildlife and environmental conservation while Team PokerStars pro Humberto Brenes works with the PRETOMA Shark Conversation program, an organization dedicated to protecting sharks in their natural habitat.

Singer reiterated the common ecological notion that everything starts with the individual – even in poker.

“What I would say to people is to just start something,” he said. “Even if you think it’s just a drop in the bucket. Personally I think the only way we’re going to get around global warming is if everyone’s attitude changes.

“If we keep going the way we’re going we’re headed for a disaster.”

This is a brief introduction to world of environmentalism, sustainability and the poker industry. For more information please check out the links presented below:

Links:

World Wildlife Foundation

http://www.worldwildlife.org/

David Suzuki Foundation

http://www.davidsuzuki.or

EGM Green

http://www.egmgreen.com/index.html

Treehugger

http://www.treehugger.com/

Guide to carbon offsets

http://www.davidsuzuki.org/Climate_Change/What_You_Can_Do/carbon_offsets.asp

Visit PokerListings.com

British Columbia Poker Championship Winner Sophon Sek Arrested

Less than a day after winning this year’s British Columbia Poker Championship and earning the first place prize of $364,364, 30 year-old Sophon Sek was arrested on charges of manslaughter and breaking and entering.  As a result, his prize money is being held at the casino at the request of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) and there is a chance it will be confiscated from Sek altogether.

Sek is the sixth person arrested in connection with the Surrey Six murder case.  In October of 2007, six people were shot in the head and killed in the Surrey area high rise apartment building Balmoral Towers.  The murders are believed to be an act of gang violence, as four of the six victims were known to be part of the British Columbia drug trade.  The men suspected in the murders are members of the Red Scorpions, one of the largest and most influential gangs in British Columbia.  The Surrey Six slayings are considered to be one of the worst instances of gang violence in modern British Columbian history.

The Vancouver Sun newspaper reported that Sek is believed to be an associate of the Red Scorpions as well.  Statements from Corporal Dale Carr of the police force gave little insight on why Sek was arrested and faced lesser charges than the other five men previously detained in the killings, but the Sun reported that Sek is not believed to be one of the murderers. According to the paper, the RCMP believe that it was Sek who let the perpetrators into the high rise, though it is still unclear whether or not he was aware of their intentions.

Howard Blank, Vice President of the Great Canadian Gaming Corporation, reported that the RCMP requested Sek’s winnings from the $2,700 (CDN) buy-in event.  Sek outlasted a field of 679 players including poker pros Gavin Smith, “Yukon” Brad Booth, Mike “SirWatts” Watson, Tiffany Michelle, Maria Ho, Greg “FBT” Mueller, and Scott “BigRiskky” Clements, who made the final table, finishing in seventh place.

Sek was set to return to River Rock Casino in Vancouver, the site of the event, to pick up his winnings Monday, but his arrest prevented him from doing so.  He is currently being held in custody until his trial date on November 30th.  His lawyer, Alan Ip, spoke to the British Columbia Globe and Mail about the seizure of Sek’s winnings.  According to Ip, unless the money was taken as evidence in the case, it was unjustly seized.  Carr told the Sun he was not aware of the RCMP’s request for the casino to hold the funds and could not provide an explanation as to why the money would be seized in relation to the case.  Ip also emphasized how saddened his client was at the prospect of losing his tournament earnings, as he planned to pursue his love for poker and play in other events in the future.

One of the five other suspects in the case, Dennis Karbonavec, has already pled guilty and was sentenced to life in prison.  Following his admission of guilt, three others were arrested in relation to the case in April of 2008 and have been in pretrial custody ever since.  The charges against the men include first and second degree murder, conspiracy to commit murder, and various firearms-related charges.

This is not the first time Sek has had a run in with the police.  He was previously charged with possession of an unlicensed firearm in July of 2008.

Kentucky Cabinet Secretary Discusses Internet Gambling Battle

One month ago, the Kentucky Supreme Court heard arguments in a case that pits the state’s Justice and Public Safety Cabinet against the owners of 141 internet gambling domain names, including those belonging to industry titans like PokerStars and Fill Tilt Poker.

Heading the Cabinet is J. Michael Brown, who was present during oral arguments in the Frankfort courtroom and brought the legal action against the domain names in question one year ago. Brown told Poker News Daily that nothing discussed during the October 22nd hearing caught him off-guard. He added, “In discussing some of the procedural background, members of the court touched on some of the underlying issues, everything from whether a domain name is a device and how a device is defined to what measures the Commonwealth can employ to defend itself against unregulated internet gambling.”

Representing the internet gambling sites were a consortium of lawyers, including those from the Interactive Media Entertainment and Gaming Association (iMEGA), the Interactive Gaming Council (IGC), and several of the targeted sites. Despite the large presence of trade organizations during the proceedings, Brown and company questioned why no domain owners had come forth to defend themselves. The Secretary told Poker News Daily, “Who were the stakeholders on the other side? There didn’t seem to be anyone standing up saying that they represent these innocent owners. Their arguments were all over the map, from the First Amendment to likening it to a criminal proceeding. I was pleased that the court spent time looking at the underlying issues.”

Many in the industry have cautioned that the outcome of the Kentucky internet gambling case may set a precedent worldwide. More light could be shed on where domain names are located and who has rights to seize or regulate them as a result of the seven-member Kentucky Supreme Court’s decision. On the global implications of the Commonwealth’s actions, Brown frankly stated, “I’m only focusing on Kentucky. Our interest is in the unregulated gambling that we believe has been going on. I don’t know that our Supreme Court is ready to look at it as a worldwide precedent because a lot of the underlying facts haven’t been completely developed.”

Influencing the Commonwealth is the presence of a booming horse racing industry in Kentucky, headlined every May by the running of the Kentucky Derby. The spectacle, which unfolds from Churchill Downs in Louisville, generates a considerable amount of revenue for the State, bringing in high rollers, celebrities, politicians, and horse racing fans from around the globe.

The 141 internet gambling domain names are owned by companies located in places like Costa Rica, Gibraltar, Canada, and Isle of Man. Brown explained, “You have people who own and operate domain names. In order to regulate them, you have to go to the registrars because the actual owners are all offshore.” Registrars include giants like GoDaddy.com, which features Team PokerStars Pro member Vanessa Rousso as one if its spokesmen.

When the Kentucky Supreme Court will hand down a decision in the case is not yet known. Joe Brennan, Chairman of iMEGA, told Poker News Daily that he would set an over/under of March, 2010. Rich Muny, Kentucky State Director for the Poker Players Alliance (PPA), contrastingly, expected a decision to be rendered by Christmas.

The 141 internet gambling domain names were seized in September of 2008 on the grounds that they were illegal “gambling devices,” a term that traditionally refers to tangible objects like slot machines and roulette wheels that you’d find in an underground casino. Judge Thomas Wingate upheld the Commonwealth’s actions one month later before the industry sought the intervention of the Kentucky Court of Appeals. The judicial body ruled against the State by a two-to-one margin in January, setting up October’s showdown in the Kentucky Supreme Court.

Stay tuned to Poker News Daily for the latest from the Commonwealth of Kentucky.

Eurolinx Poker Liquidation Update

This year, we’ve seen two major stories break on Poker News Daily involving small poker sites shutting down and player funds disappearing in the midst of scandals involving shady ownership groups.  Pitbull Poker was shut down amid dwindling player numbers and a superuser scandal, with many players out tens of thousands of dollars.  Perhaps the bigger story was the surprising shutdown and liquidation of Eurolinx Poker.

On September 17th, Poker News Daily interviewed sponsored pro and official affiliate Marc Karam.  His affiliation with Eurolinx went back to 2006 and he not only was a sponsored pro, but he also referred hundreds of players to the poker site.  Karam was made a lot of promises by Eurolinx manager and owner Jo Remme.  In mid-2008, Remme asked Karam to borrow $200,000 and in return, Eurolinx was supposed to cover all expenses related to launching a new poker skin just for Karam.  In the end, Karam lost hundreds of thousands of dollars and stated that he’s trying to put the situation behind him and get a fresh start in the world of poker.

On the TwoPlusTwo forums, there are two main threads dedicated to the Eurolinx scandal. The first was started by Karam, who recapped his Eurolinx story.  In September, several players made posts in this thread to the effect that they wanted to pool their resources together to help in the recovery of their funds.  This particular thread died in the end of September with most transitioning to the one entitled “Eurolinx w/d problems > UPDATE: Eurolinx seeks to put business into liquidation.”

This new thread, posted around the same time the previous one died, is where a lot of the actual discussion about bringing up charges against Remme in his native Norway takes place.  In the middle of September, a post was made allegedly posting a comment from MicroGaming itself.  The statement read that they were shocked and saddened that “this has happened to one of our licensees” and they were awaiting further information.

On September 23rd, a post was made by “ditou26” that came from a private investigator from Norway.  The message from the investigator said that it would cost someone €2,000 to hire him to find Remme and make a claim on the client’s behalf.  The investigator did warn that Remme has no more assets and is broke, in which case there would be nothing to take back from him.

On October 5th, an interesting post was made by “jdredd,” who claimed to be ‘Negativity’ on Eurolinx and had over $75,000 on the site.  On behalf of himself and an associate, they hired a lawyer in Malta, but moved the investigation to Curacao.  They moved an order of liquidation from the court, which was never responded to by Eurolinx.  Eventually, they moved the court so that they had to be paid if Eurolinx wished to keep its license.  Only a few days later, Microgaming wound up shutting them down.  For all of his international legal efforts, jdredd and his associate were out over $125,000.

In the most recent weeks on the same thread at TwoPlusTwo, it seems the steam has been taken out of this case and the cold reality of the situation has set in.  If a high-stakes player like jdredd, who searched all avenues and used his legal expertise couldn’t get a dime, chances are nobody else would either.  For the most part, it seems that nothing has changed with the Eurolinx scandal.

It goes without saying that the two major shutdown stories of 2009 involving Eurolinx and Pitbull Poker are tales of warning to internet poker players.  All players really have to assure them that their funds are safe are the historical reputations of the poker sites.  For now though, the players that are out funds on Eurolinx continue to search for any way to recover just a fraction of their lost funds.

Pitbull Poker Players and Affiliates Chase Losses

Oftentimes at a poker table, a good player will suffer a bad beat at the hands of an inferior opponent for a stack of cash.  If it’s one of those sessions, it might happen two or three times and even more if it’s really a doozy.  What follows is that some players quit, while others stand firm until they recoup as much as they feel is possible.  The same can happen in real life away from the virtual felts, as affiliates and players victimized by the sudden shutdown of Pitbull Poker can attest to.  As the months have gone by covering the story, we’ve seen a small post on the TwoPlusTwo online poker forum lead us to witnessing the closure of a poker room with hundreds of thousands of dollars missing amid a superuser scandal.

A major affiliate who goes by the moniker “JC Hawk” has led the charge in seeking justice and not just accepting his losses as a bad beat.  He was an affiliate with Pitbull Poker and the Flash Poker Network and was also in contact with Network Manager Dave Brenes and Pitbull Poker owner Kevin Baronowski.  When asked if there were any indications that something might be awry at Pitbull before the closure, Hawk said, “There were lots of red flags. When I told them [my lawyers and I] were coming down to Costa Rica in late September, they stopped talking to me.”

JC Hawk estimates that he is owed well over $100,000 from his affiliate poker site NLPT.tv on top of cash investments into Pitbull Poker directly.  Through the article comments here at Poker News Daily as well as by private messages on TwoPlusTwo, he has put together a list of people claiming losses against Pitbull Poker and brought his case before the government in Costa Rica.  “The government has been great to work with so far.  They don’t want to see people from other countries scammed, as it hurts their trade market worldwide and scares investors away.  The U.S. Embassy and the Costa Rican government are working hard to prosecute this and get any recovery they can.”

The debates rage on in the forums about which accounts were superusers, with many regulars agreeing that there’s solid evidence in support of the theory.  “Chesterboy,” the original poster who started the discussion about the issue, has decided to quit poker altogether and recently joined the U.S. Army.  Brenes, the former Network Manager for Pitbull Poker, has stated multiple times that he is no longer employed by Pitbull, never handled player funds, and is not to be considered a principle for the ownership group in any way.  He has declined further comment on the issue.

All that exists now on Pitbull Poker’s website is a message stating that the room is now closed.  The item of note on the site is a message informing visitors, “To cash out your balance, please email support@pitbullpoker.com,” which appears at the top of the page.  Since the closure of the poker room, there seem to have been no players having contact with the accounting department at Pitbull, much less receiving payouts on their outstanding balances.

There have been no statements from current or former Pitbull Poker employees or management and the forums continue to rage on about the superuser scandal.  With Chesterboy off to serve in the Army, “BCloud,” who has pinpointed a number of highly suspicious accounts, has raged the main argument in the superuser debate.  Through replaying Pitbull hand histories and compiling a list of activities, he’s certainly raised some eyebrows in recent weeks.

The legal battle begins to ramp up in Costa Rica through the efforts of JC Hawk and numerous high-stakes players who believe they can recover funds.  Stay tuned to Poker News Daily as more develops.

Gowen lawsuit tilts again

The lawsuit, filed Nov. 14, 2008, sought $40 million in damages from Full Tilt Poker, Tiltware, a series of related companies, Tiltware CEO Raymond Bitar and a group of Team Full Tilt players, claiming, among other things, breach of contract.

Gowen alleged that in 2004 she was offered a 1% stake in the site in exchange for her services as a celebrity endorser, but never received compensation.

She was dropped from the Team Full Tilt roster just days before the suit was filed.

Federal Judge Robert Jones granted a motion to dismiss the case back in April of this year, but the lawsuit was not thrown out in its entirety.

Gowen was given leave to amend the complaint to include just Full Tilt Poker, Tiltware, the related companies, Bitar and Howard Lederer as defendants and appeal the decision to dismiss the case.

However, in a decision released this week, Judge Jones both denied Gowen's appeal and granted Full Tilt's latest motion to dismiss the newly amended complaint.

Although, it appears the suit is not dead yet.

Judge Jones has granted Gowen leave to amend the complaint a third time to include only Tiltware.

Gowen and her lawyers have 15 days from the Oct. 14 decision date to file the amended complaint.

A former Oklahoma teen beauty queen, Gowen has over $1.6 million in career tournament earnings.

Visit PokerListings.com

Internet Gambling Proponents Prepare for Kentucky Supreme Court Hearing

On Thursday, lawyers from the Interactive Media Entertainment and Gaming Association (iMEGA) will lead a contingent into Frankfort, Kentucky in a case involving the seizure and potential forfeiture of 141 internet gambling domain names. Among those prepping is Ian Ramsey from Stites and Harbison, local counsel for the Interactive Gaming Council (IGC).

Oral arguments in the case will begin at 11:00am local time. The case is the final one on the docket for the week, leaving many in the industry speculating that the proceedings could last for longer than the scheduled 15 minutes per side. Ramsey told Poker News Daily what he’s expecting to unfold: “I expect that we’re going to have a lot of questions from the bench. The parties have raised many issues and the Supreme Court is going to have to sort through them.”

Among those factors that will contribute to the Supreme Court’s decision is whether the Commonwealth of Kentucky had jurisdiction to seize the domain names on the grounds that they were “gambling devices” and whether the State bringing a criminal gambling charge to a civil forfeiture hearing will hold weight. On the question of jurisdiction, Ramsey cited a ruling by the Arizona Supreme Court on October 16th, which the IGC submitted as supplemental authority in its Kentucky case. The Arizona legal battle ended with the state’s highest judicial body ruling, “However noble the State’s purpose is, in rem jurisdiction requires presence of the subject property in the state.”

The question remains as to where a domain name is located. Is it located on a bettor’s computer? Is it located on a server? Is it located overseas where the internet gambling site is based? Is it located somewhere in cyberspace? The Commonwealth of Kentucky, under the direction of Governor Steve Beshear and Justice and Public Safety Cabinet Secretary J. Michael Brown, charged that domain names were “gambling devices,” a term typically reserved for objects like roulette wheels and slot machines that you’d find in an underground casino.

Ramsey explained the far-reaching impact of the case, which has garnered worldwide attention: “The citizens of the Commonwealth of Kentucky are interested, the citizens of the United States are interested, and anyone around the world on the internet is interested in this case. We look forward to a well-reasoned, thoughtful opinion by our Supreme Court.” In January, the Kentucky Court of Appeals in Louisville ruled by a two to one margin that the State did not have jurisdiction to act. The lone dissenting opinion noted that the domain names were part of a larger gambling device.

The URLs in jeopardy belong to some of the behemoths of the industry like PokerStars, Full Tilt Poker, and Ultimate Bet. Full Tilt Poker sought a backup plan by purchasing FullTilt.com last September, shortly after word broke that FullTiltPoker.com was among those domain names seized. Poker News Daily also learned that Ultimate Bet and Absolute Poker, both members of the USA-friendly CEREUS Network, had contingency plans in the event that their primary domain names were held hostage. If successful, the 141 domain names under fire would be unavailable not only in Kentucky, but also around the world.

Besides iMEGA and IGC, other organizations involved in the legal squabble include the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the Electronic Frontier Foundation, eBay, Network Solutions, the Poker Players Alliance (PPA), and the Center for Democracy and Technology. In its amicus brief, the PPA argued that its one million members will suffer “immediate and irreparable harm” if the domain names are inaccessible and that poker is a game of skill and therefore not illegal gambling.

Full Tilt Responds to Poker Bot Lawsuit

Online poker room Full Tilt Poker is known for keeping mum when it comes to its legal and business matters, but the company broke its silence to comment on a recent lawsuit by former customers Lary Kennedy and Greg Omotov.  Full Tilt issued a statement to the media regarding the case in which the company asserts that the plaintiffs’ accusations are false and there was just cause behind the closure of the two players’ accounts.

News of Kennedy and Omotov’s suit broke earlier this month when their lawyer, Cyrus Sanai, filed in a California court.  Within the claim, the two individuals allege that Full Tilt Poker unjustly confiscated their accounts following false accusations that they were using poker bots to play on the site’s cash game tables.  They then went on to suggest that Full Tilt used bots of its own and also leveled several other claims ranging from fraud to violations of the Racketeer-Influenced Corrupt Organization (RICO) Act.

Full Tilt addressed some, but not all, of Kennedy and Omotov’s accusations in a statement which refers to the suit as “baseless” and “frivolous.”  The statement, which was posted in full on Gambling911, went on to explain, “Both of these player accounts were appropriately terminated for multiple violations of the express terms and conditions governing fair and lawful play in the Full Tilt Poker online virtual cardroom, including their own admissions of using multiple accounts.”

Kennedy admitted to multi-accounting in a lengthy thread on the TwoPlusTwo online poker forum.  She said she sometimes used Omotov’s idle Full Tilt account to get action at the heads-up cash game tables after many regulars stopped playing with her when she was logged in on her personal account under her own username.

The statement from Full Tilt also addressed the claims that the site operates its own bots on the cash game tables: “Full Tilt Poker has never knowingly allowed ‘bots’ to play on its site… When fraud, collusion, and cheating of any kind is uncovered, Full Tilt Poker investigates extensively and then acts accordingly and appropriately, as was the case involving these claimants.”  Full Tilt not only affirmed its belief that the two players were cheating, but the company also suggested the two individuals will “be obliged to compensate the aggrieved defendants for any harm that may arise out of their false allegations and for the wrongful institution of these bad faith legal proceedings.”

While Full Tilt’s statement addressed the issue of bot use, the site did not comment on some of the suit’s claims about racketeering, unfair competition, and operating an illegal online casino in the state of California.  The statement also failed to confirm or deny any assertions about Howard Lederer, Raymond Bitar, and Chris Ferguson’s role within the company.  The lawsuit suggests that these three individuals serve as top executives for both Tiltware and Vert Enterprises.  These two companies are supposedly different entities run out of California and St. Kitts and Nevis, respectively, but the suit claims they are one in the same and controlled by Bitar, Lederer, and Ferguson.

The company has yet to issue a statement on its pending lawsuits involving former sponsored pro Clonie Gowen and former employee Jason “JDN” Newitt.

Poker Community Responds to Amazing Race Premiere

Professional poker players Maria Ho and Tiffany Michelle are quickly becoming the talk of reality television fans and poker enthusiasts alike after just one episode of the new season of the CBS series “Amazing Race.”  These two racers, who each made their claim to fame by being the last women remaining in the World Series of Poker (WSOP) Main Event, are quickly gaining fans and critics after the two-hour premiere, during which they went from first to last place, impressing and irritating their competitors along the way.

Poker News Daily sought the opinions of those on both sides of the issue in order to gain more insight into why the Ho/Michelle team has such a polarizing effect on people.  In addition to discussing some of the pros and cons of their appearance, we also picked up behind the scenes information that sheds more light on how the two young women are being portrayed.

The Skeptic

It didn’t take long for occasional poker journalist and online poker regular Jon Wein to decide that he did not enjoy the duo of poker ladies participating in the show.  He tuned in to watch the show, but Wein claims he “had to turn it off after [Tiffany Michelle] and Maria Ho implied they were rich for the like eighteenth time.”

His biggest issue with the two women appearing on the show is that it deprives other, ostensibly more deserving, poker players from time in the limelight.  “It literally makes me sick that Tiffany Michelle gets this much coverage and publicity for one Main Event run. She’s done nothing else,” he explained.  “Ultimate Bet has all of these talented pros like Matt ‘mattg1983’ Graham and Adam ‘Roothlus’ Levy and then they have her… It’s a complete slap in the face to them.”  Wein even took a playful jab at Michelle’s former Poker News employer Tony “Tony G” Guoga.  “I literally curse Tony G’s name to this day because he put her in the Main Event,” he joked.

While Wein has a very clear opinion on Michelle, he has less to say about her partner.  “I don’t know Maria and have never spoken to her.  I only know what the media portrays her as,” he said.

Considering poker players do not get too many opportunities at mainstream media exposure, an appearance on a reality show can have a major influence on how the game is perceived by those who are not fans of it.  Wein is skeptical that the team, Michelle in particular, will grow poker’s popularity.  “Even if [Michelle] is the sickest ‘Amazing Race’ contestant ever, I just don’t understand how anyone can be like, ‘Wow, what a great ambassador for the game. What a humble person about their successes’…I think she is a poor example of what a poker player should be.”  His opinion is based not only on the first episode of “Amazing Race”, but also last year’s Main Event coverage and his own personal experiences over the course of several summers in Las Vegas.

He may just be one viewer, but the presence of Michelle and Ho on the show has actually convinced the longtime “Amazing Race” fan to take some time off from tuning in, as Wein said he had no plans to watch future episodes this season.

The Supporter

Like Wein, longtime tournament reporter B.J. Nemeth knew Ho and Michelle long before their appearance on “Amazing Race.”  In fact, it is only because of their presence on the show that he tuned in this season.  “I have never watched ‘Amazing Race’ before this season and I am watching primarily because I am friends with Maria and Tiffany,” Nemeth explained.  “I am also watching (to a lesser extent) because of my weekly appearances on PokerRoad’s ‘The Poker Beat,’ where I am sure we will discuss and analyze the show at some point, just as we did with Annie Duke on ‘Celebrity Apprentice.’”  He is a fan so far and even suggested that he might tune into the show for future seasons.

The show has made a fan of Nemeth, but he thinks it will have little impact on bringing new fans to poker.  He explained, comparing their appearance to Duke’s memorable run on “Celebrity Apprentice”:

“Amazing Race” is a unique game and the specific job skills that people bring with them will have little impact, whether they are a doctor, a lawyer, or a poker player.  “If [Michelle and Ho] perform well or win, it won’t be because they are poker players. If they embarrass themselves and lose, it won’t be because they are poker players. And I don’t think mainstream fans will judge the poker industry by how they finish… The impact on poker is very different from Annie Duke’s presence on ‘Celebrity Apprentice,’ where she was only on the show because she was a famous poker player, and it was brought up repeatedly from a strategy standpoint and in the boardroom with Donald Trump.”

Nemeth also conceded that any publicity was good publicity though and, unlike Wein, believed that the appearance of the young female poker players would more than likely help rather than hurt the poker cause.  When it comes to Wein’s concerns that their behavior will come off as indicative of the poker industry as a whole, Nemeth disagreed.  “Even though ‘Amazing Race’ fans identify Maria and Tiffany as the ‘poker players’ or the ‘poker girls,’ that’s just an identifier because it’s tough to learn names of 10 to 12 two-person teams,” he pointed out.  “They refer to the other teams in similar ways – ‘the asshole lawyer,’ ‘the interracial couple,’ ‘the father-son team,’ and ‘the gay brothers.’ Reality TV fans are smart enough to know that personality traits are unique to individuals and not to entire professions or sexual preferences.”

The Scoop

Ho and Nemeth had a lengthy chat after the show’s Sunday premiere and Nemeth shared behind-the-scenes details of the first episode with Poker News Daily.  “Maria and Tiffany have agreed that they won’t be answering their critics or talking about specific things until the show is complete. It’s not easy, because they’ve seen a lot of the criticism and want to respond, but they know it would be counterproductive at this point,” Nemeth explained.  However, he did clear up a couple of early points of criticism on behalf of his friends.

He immediately addressed a major issue that both reality television fans and poker enthusiasts were quick to criticize the girls for - their rolling luggage.  Historically, backpacks have proven to be the most popular way to travel on the show and avid fans suggest that rolling luggage slows players down too much during crucial periods of the race where they may have to run.  Nemeth explained that their bags convert into backpacks and the clip showing Ho rolling it down the street was during a three mile walk from one location to the next.

Nemeth also filled us in on the controversial decision by the pair to conceal their occupation from their opponents.  According to Nemeth, the producers encouraged them to keep their status as poker pros under wraps since previous contestants like former “Survivor” winners Rob Mariano and Amber Brkich were highly criticized by their fellow racers for already being rich and famous.

As for their false claim that they worked with a non-profit group?  This is not entirely a lie.  Both women have done a lot of charity work, so there was more truth to their statements than the show depicted.  “The homeless charity that Tiffany mentioned on the show is a real charity that she has worked with and its director called her on Monday to support her,” said Nemeth.  He also said that the girls received less flack from their competitors about their tiny fib than the show implied and that they are still in touch with over half of the teams from the season.

These are just two of several opinions on a show that still has a long way to go to reach the finish line.  In every season of reality television, there will inevitably be heroes and villains.  So far, Ho and Michelle are netting their fair share of criticism compared to the other participants, but picking up a few new fans as well, so it will take a little more airtime to get a better idea of how they will be remembered on “Amazing Race” and whether or not it will have any bearing on the world of poker.

Amazing Race: Tiffany Michelle, Maria Ho Escape Elimination in Premiere

Poker pros Tiffany Michelle and Maria Ho were spared elimination on the premiere of the CBS reality show Amazing Race, which is entering its 15th season. Michelle and Ho arrived at the first pit stop in last place.

The 15th installment of the CBS franchise began in the L.A. River, the site of movies like “Grease.” Twelve teams arrived by bus, including Michelle and Ho, who told other teams that they worked for a non-profit instead of admitting they were wealthy poker players and the last women standing in the 2007 and 2008 World Series of Poker (WSOP) Main Events.

In a new twist, the first challenge took place immediately, with the last team to complete it eliminated at the starting mat. In it, teams had to sort through 1,000 license plates for one of 11 from Shinagawa, Tokyo, their first destination. Despite confusing license plates, some with misleading Japanese symbols on them, Michelle and Ho finished the task first and headed to the airport to fly to Tokyo. On completing the task first, Michelle quipped, “We have our Asian lucky charm right here,” referring to Ho. In the end, married yoga teachers Eric and Lisa were eliminated in Los Angeles.

All teams flew to Japan, where they were told to head to the Tokyo Tower Television Studio. There, a live audience awaited a game of “Sushi Roulette,” which capitalized on the popularity of Japanese game shows. The Roadblock, which is a task that only one team member can perform, asked contestants to stand in front of a giant roulette wheel and eat the food that landed in front of them. The two players who received scorching hot wasabi bombs had to consume it in less than two minutes in order to receive their next clue. Play continued until each team had eaten a wasabi bomb.

On-screen graphics like an alligator breathing fire added flair to this task, which saw the wasabi land on Ho’s space on the third spin. However, she was unable to eat it within the two-minute time frame and had to play again. As luck would have it, the wasabi once again landed on her space on the fourth spin. Ho told Amazing Race cameras, “My hands were shaking. I was tearing up. It was just like one of those moments where people say it’s mind over matter.” Ho finished her wasabi with two seconds left on the clock.

After completing “Sushi Roulette,” the teams received a colored flag, which corresponded to the visors of 20 audience members. They had to lead their group to the Konno Hachimangu Shrine across town on foot navigating Tokyo’s congested streets. Dating couple Meghan and Cheyne arrived at the Shrine, the Pit Stop for the leg of the race, first and received trips to Aspen and Vail.

Michelle and Ho stopped at a hotel to get a map to the Shrine, sharing its location with brothers Sam and Dan. Michelle explained, “They’re both young, hot, 20-something guys who have become our friends.” Meanwhile, two members of Michelle and Ho’s group became separated in Tokyo’s maze of crowded streets. After hunting around, the poker players were unable to locate their lost crowd members and checked in at the first Amazing Race Pit Stop in last place. Michelle and Ho were assessed a two-hour time penalty for not completing the task, but were spared being sent home in a non-elimination leg. As punishment, they would be forced to complete a Speed Bump, which is a task that only Michelle and Ho would perform, in the upcoming leg.

The teams were then dispatched to Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, where they were taken by bus to Cai Be. Despite departing three hours behind other teams at 3:22am from the Pit Stop, Michelle and Ho were quickly able to catch up, as the first flight to Vietnam did not leave until 10:30am. Meanwhile, Lance Layne, an engaged lawyer from Massachusetts, lashed out at Michelle and Ho for not being eliminated on the previous leg: “I can’t believe they gave those two chicks a Speed Bump. Bastards should have been sent home.”

A person at the airport recognized Michelle and asked, “Did you get into the Top 15?” This generated doubt in Michelle and Ho’s stated profession as non-profit workers, eventually leading to other teams figuring out that they were actually poker players. Teams arrived at the Cai Be docks just before nightfall only to see that it did not open until 7:00am. In the morning, they proceeded to mud pits across the Mekong Delta and were tasked with scooping enough mud to fertilize a fruit tree by filling up its base to a designated red line.

Before completing the fruit tree task, Michelle and Ho served the Cai Be dock master soup for their Speed Bump. The poker-playing duo completed the extra challenge with ease before heading to the mud pits. Michelle and Ho were in last place leaving the pits due to the time lost while completing the Speed Bump, but gained ground in the leg’s Road Block, which consisted of herding 150 ducks across a bridge and back again in a fenced enclosure.

Michelle claimed that she had ducks growing up and “flew” through the task, leading to the team being in sixth place after finishing the Roadblock. The Pit Stop on the Vietnam leg was a boat, the Bassac III, and Michelle and Ho arrived in seventh place, surviving a chaotic two-hour episode. Father and son Gary and Matt came in first place and won kayaks.

Amazing Race airs every Sunday on CBS at 8:00pm ET. Next week will see Michelle, Ho, and the rest of the CBS reality show’s cast travel to Cambodia.

Master hunts 7th bracelet, denies cheating

When play resumes in London Wednesday, Men "The Master" Nguyen will have a legitimate shot at his seventh WSOP bracelet, coming in third in chips behind Swede Mats Gavatin, an EPT champion, and London's own Richard Gryko, who made 50th at the 2009 WSOP Main Event.

Sitting behind Nguyen in the chip counts are Canadian Erik Cajelais, who booked runner-up finishes at both the WPT and WSOP in 2007, and the UK's Robin Keston, who counts both an EPT and WSOP final table on his resume.

But despite the fact a win would move him into a tie for sixth on the all-time bracelet winners list with Phil Ivey and Billy Baxter, Nguyen says he doesn't play the game for such honors.

"To be honest with you, making money motivates me; I don't care about more bracelets," he told PokerListings. "I already proved to the world that I am a very good player. I've won so many tournaments that I can't even count them all. I've won player of the year four times. I don't have to prove anything to the world.

"I came to enjoy myself here in England. I came to play with other players here in the UK and from Europe and make money. That's important, not that I can win more bracelets and show poker players and the whole world that I'm good. They already know."

Allegations of chip dumping, card marking and other unethical practices at the poker table have swirled around Nguyen for years.

To this day he denies it all.

"I see a lot of things they say on the Internet," he said. "If they say that in any magazine I'll sue them for slander, but I've never seen it. They slander me on the Internet, but I talked to my lawyer and he said they can say anything they want on the Internet.

"They are probably jealous. I earned what I won. I came to the United States empty-handed. I got what I won, I got my name out there and people just talk about me now. Show me. Catch me. Until they can prove it they should not talk about it. It's just gossip."

Nguyen fled communist Vietnam in 1978 and settled in Los Angeles, California. He started playing poker in 1984 and won his first WSOP bracelet in 1992.

A devout Buddhist, Nguyen reiterated that he would never cheat and never has.

"I'm a Buddhist so I am afraid to cheat," he explained. "If I cheat on anything it will come back to me. If I do something like that God will punish me.

"If I cheated do you think I would be able to go all over the world and play poker? They would kick me out of every tournament."

An emotional player at the tables, Nguyen has also been accused of being abusive to dealers and floor staff.

Again, Nguyen denies any wrongdoing.

"The problem is that sometimes dealers make mistakes and I just try to correct them," he said. "If you play with me at the table you will see how good I am and how nice I am. I will always be nice.

"People talk and they don't think. People say 'Oh Men, you did this or that,' but they don't know. The dealer comes in and maybe they don't change the deck, so I ask why they don't change the deck, because it's a rule. I'm just correcting mistakes."

Regardless of all the allegations against him, with $9,116,177 in career tournament earnings coming into the 2009 WSOPE, Nguyen sits 12th on poker's all time money winners list.

His 65 cashes at the WSOP also put him second only to Phil Hellmuth's 75, and when the final five players return to London's Casino at the Empire Wednesday, Nguyen will have a chance to add to his already stacked resume.

To follow all the action live from Leicester Square click through to PokerListings' Live Tournaments page beginning at 2 p.m. BST.

Visit PokerListings.com

Marc Karam Talks Eurolinx Scandal

Marc Karam is a well-known online poker personality who has been playing professionally for a number of years.  His final table run during the 2006 European Poker Tour (EPT) Monte Carlo Grand Final launched him to a new status of stardom.  Recently, his sponsored site, Eurolinx, went into liquidation on the Microgaming Network and potentially thousands of players won’t see a dime of the bankrolls they held on the site for the foreseeable future.  Poker News Daily discussed the matter with Karam in this exclusive interview.

Poker News Daily: How far back did your affiliation with Eurolinx go and at what point did you become a sponsored player?

Karam: After I made the final table of EPT Monte Carlo in April of 2006, I was approached by a Eurolinx representative and asked if I was interested in entering a sponsorship deal with the site.  I said I was and he put me in contact with Eurolinx’s VIP manager at the time.  After some negotiations, we agreed to a deal.

PND: As one of the site’s sponsored players, what benefits did you receive and what did you bring to the table for them?

Karam: As a sponsored player, I was getting 100% rakeback, a better-than-normal affiliate deal, and paid live tournament entries.  In return, I referred over 1,000 players to them through my blog, forum, and local bar league freerolls.

PND: It seems a lot of the nosebleed action at the site dried up a while ago.

Karam: The nosebleed action dried up around mid-2008.  Almost everyone moved to Full Tilt and only a few regulars remained.  I’m not sure of the exact circumstances, but it was probably just that the games were juicier on Full Tilt.

PND: Eurolinx’s owner/manager Jo Remme made a lot of promises to you to help his poker site. What were some of those promises and do you know of any agreements made with other people?

Karam: He asked me to borrow money in mid-2008.  I lent him $200,000 and, in return, Eurolinx was supposed to cover all expenses related to launching my own skin on the Microgaming Network.  I would get to keep all of the players I referred and Eurolinx would receive 25% of my net profit for running the backend.  I had websites created, merchandise and gear ordered with my logos, etc., for the new site.  From what I have heard, he sold a few shares of Eurolinx to high-stakes players who were playing on or sponsored by the site at the time.

PND: What was your reaction when you heard about the liquidation and what legal options did you have to protect your assets?

Karam: They actually asked to borrow the money in 2008.  They recovered for a while and then started having financial trouble again earlier this year.  When I heard they were shutting down and in liquidation, I felt sick to my stomach.  It was anger, hurt, and shock.  I knew I didn’t have many legal options because the money was most likely already gone.  I did immediately contact a few lawyers.

PND: Now that Eurolinx has gone into liquidation, you’ve most likely suffered the biggest financial loss of anyone involved.  Do you mind speaking about your financial losses?

Karam: I’d rather not say exactly how much I lost, but it was not $1 million as was mentioned on the TwoPlusTwo Podcast.  In my statement, I said I had $1 million at one time when I gave the loan.  Withdrawals and a pretty ugly downswing left me with less than that.

PND: Where do you go from here in terms of trying to recoup lost funds?

Karam: Right now, I have pretty much written off my losses and anything I do recover will be looked at as a bonus.  After seeing what resulted from the Tusk scandal, my hopes are not high.

PND: What’s your guess as to what happened to the millions of dollars that apparently have vanished?

Karam: There are really only two likely scenarios: bad investments or theft.

PND: It seems like you weren’t the only high-stakes player to lose six- or seven-figures, as Tom “durrrr” Dwan himself posted in the thread.  Are you pooling your resources to fight for lost funds?

Karam: We spoke briefly; there are people who are pooling resources and I am considering joining them shortly.

PND: You are still a well-known commodity in the poker world who has a lot of clout with players.  Once the dust settles, there are surely going to be offers for you to sign on at a new poker room.  What are you going to look for out of a potential deal?

Karam: The first thing I would look at in a potential sponsor would be a widely-trusted reputation and the security of players’ funds.  I definitely won’t be jumping at the first deal that comes my way.  Of course, the money is important too, but I will never put my or my referred players’ funds in a risky situation again.

PND: There have been a lot of well-wishers in the poker industry to you and others taken advantage of in this scandal.  Have their comments helped in any way?

Karam: Their comments mean a lot to me.  I also received many PMs and e-mails offering support. At a time when I was feeling depressed and somewhat embarrassed, reading the comments was very comforting and helped put this terrible situation behind me.

PND: What’s the plan moving into the future?

Karam: Right now, I’m just trying to put the whole situation behind me and start fresh. I’ve been playing a lot of poker, but I also won’t let what happened discourage me from continuing to work on the affiliate side of things. I have learned many lessons from this.

PND: Do you have any final statements aimed at others affected by the situation?

Karam: While this situation is extremely unfortunate, I hope it wakes up not only the people who were victimized by it, but also the entire poker world, and puts a lot more pressure onto sites and networks to ensure it never happens again. I’d also like to thank a lot of the ex-staff at Eurolinx who have helped out in the investigation.

Former employee sues Full Tilt

You’d think that the legal suits at Full Tilt poker had enough on their plates with the Clonie Gowan lawsuit. Now they’ve got another lawyerly dispute to resolve in the form of an unfair dismissal case levelled by former employee Jason Newitt.

Internet Gambling Law Expert Reacts to UIGEA Decision

The story of the week in the internet gambling industry has been the constitutional challenge to the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) brought on by the Interactive Media Entertainment and Gaming Association (iMEGA). Internet gambling law expert I. Nelson Rose comments on the ruling, which was passed down by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.

The Third Circuit tossed out iMEGA’s arguments that the UIGEA violated the First and Tenth Amendments of the United States Constitution as well as privacy rights and international treaties. However, the judicial body asserted, “It bears repeating that the Act itself does not make any gambling activity illegal. Whether the transaction… constitutes unlawful internet gambling turns on how the law of the state from which the bettor initiates the bet would treat that bet, i.e., if it is unlawful under that state’s law, it constitutes ‘unlawful internet gambling’ under the Act.” The bet must also be legal in the jurisdiction in which the internet gambling operator is located.

Rose was perplexed by the Third Circuit’s ruling, which seemed to, in part, shed light on the UIGEA’s meaning. He told Poker News Daily, “This decision was written by judges who appear to know absolutely nothing about gaming law.” Rose reiterated that only two states, Hawaii and Utah, ban commercial gambling. The 10-page court ruling cites Oregon as a state in which it may be problematic to conduct internet gambling. However, Rose noted, “It is bizarre to use Oregon as an example. Oregon has more forms of legal gambling than Nevada.”

Deferring to the states, therefore, may not be a straightforward endeavor. Rose explained, “I practiced law in Hawaii for over three years and I can tell you that neither these nor any other existing Hawaiian statutes clearly make all forms of internet gambling illegal.  The Oregon statute cited merely makes it a crime to transfer money for ‘unlawful gambling using the internet,’ which brings us back to the question of whether any other existing law covers internet gambling.” The U.S. Department of Justice, for example, may assert that online poker is illegal under the Wire Act, although organizations like the Poker Players Alliance (PPA) would deny such an interpretation.

If internet gambling’s legality varies on a state-by-state basis, then a long road may be in store for financial services outfits like Visa and MasterCard. Rose forecasted, “The reality is that some forms of internet gambling are expressly legal, such as pari-mutuel bets on horseracing in most states. In every other case, it would take a detailed analysis by a competent gaming lawyer to know whether the state’s anti-gambling laws might apply.” A handful of states allow permit lottery purchases, further complicating the matter. For example, TwinSpires.com, a site that offers online wagering on horse racing, is owned by the same publicly traded parent company as Churchill Downs in Kentucky.

A press release issued by iMEGA shortly after the Third Circuit’s decision noted that some forms of internet gambling were “potentially lawful” in 44 states. The organization added, “There are only a half-dozen states which have laws against internet gambling.” The Poker Voters of America (PVA) is leading the charge for licensed and regulated intrastate online poker in California. The PVA is also pushing for intrastate wagering in Florida. California offers a bevy of card rooms sprinkled within its borders, including the Commerce Casino and Bicycle Casino, which host World Poker Tour events.

iMEGA may appeal the Third Circuit’s decision in an effort to overturn the UIGEA, which was its primary goal. However, no decision has yet been made. The U.S. Department of Justice can also appeal the ruling.

Stay tuned to Poker News Daily for the latest on the iMEGA UIGEA challenge. A wealth of information on U.S. internet gambling statutes can be found at Rose’s website, GamblingAndTheLaw.com.

Online Poker Funds Remain Seized in Account Services Case

According to the San Diego Union-Tribune, online poker funds seized by the Southern District of New York belonging to Account Services will remain under guard for what the newspaper claimed “could be years.”

On August 21st, a hearing was originally scheduled featuring lawyers for the online poker payment processor Account Services arguing why $14 million should be returned to the company. The funds were seized as part of a June raid by the Southern District of New York and were contained in Wells Fargo and Union Bank accounts in California. Account Services filed a motion for return of property in the Southern District of California and the case was assigned to Judge Jeffrey Miller. However, the hearing was later cancelled indefinitely.

On Saturday, the Union-Tribune published a story claiming that Miller “denied a bid Thursday by lawyers for the company, Account Services Inc., and the Poker Players Alliance to return the money. The players group is an advocacy organization that represents some 1 million online poker players.” It added, “Now, after Miller ruled against them, it could be years before they see any of the money.” The Southern District of New York seized well over $30 million in total, affecting more than 24,000 online poker players.

Paper checks and e-checks began bouncing in June, leading to concern on popular online poker forums about the security of player deposits. In many cases, the online poker sites, including PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker, compensated players fully and oftentimes awarded a cash bonus for any inconvenience. The warrant to seize funds from the Union Bank accounts identified Full Tilt and PokerStars by name as clients of Account Services. The document read, “Account Services has previously provided payment services for companies providing online gambling services, including PokerStars and Full Tilt Poker, the largest internet poker businesses in operation.”

The Wells Fargo account was used to pay online poker players in 2008 and 2009. Still redacted (crossed out) in its warrant application is evidence that led the Southern District of New York to finger PokerStars and Full Tilt in the first place.

Account Services’ Douglas Rennick was indicted earlier this month on bank fraud, money laundering, and illegal gambling charges. He faces up to 55 years in jail and up to a $1.75 million fine plus forfeiture of funds obtained. The San Diego news outlet explains, “Prosecutors then argued the indictment made the San Diego lawsuit irrelevant and that Miller should not hear it. The judge agreed, saying the players could try to recover the money after the criminal case is resolved.”

Rennick is a Canadian citizen and, as of yet, has not surrendered to U.S. authorities. The indictment issued by the Southern District of New York revealed that Rennick had been in the business of processing internet gambling payments since 2007. Over $350 million was transferred from a bank account in Cyprus for this purpose and “Rennick… provided false and misleading information to various United States banks about, among other things, the nature of the internet gambling-related payments being processed by the companies under Rennick’s control in order to induce banks to engage in financial transactions that they otherwise would not have facilitated.”

The Poker Players Alliance (PPA) filed an amicus brief on behalf of Account Services despite Rennick’s indictment. The 1.2 million member strong organization argued that poker is a game of skill and therefore not illegal gambling. Account Services added that funds in the Union Bank accounts were seized without a warrant, which was issued about a dozen days after the asset freeze took place. FBI Special Agent Dana Conte swore to both warrant applications.

Poker News Daily is seeking comment from the PPA and Interactive Media Entertainment and Gaming Association (iMEGA).

PA jury finds poker a game of chance

Lawrence Burns, 65, was charged with twelve different illegal gambling misdemeanors in 2007 when authorities discovered he'd been running poker tournaments at two local fire halls in Westmoreland County, PA, just outside of Pittsburgh.

Burns admitted to organizing the tournaments, but argued in court it wasn't gambling because Texas Hold'em is a skill game.

Pennsylvania law defines gambling as something where a payment is made, there is the possibility of a reward and the outcome is determined by chance.

Lawyers for Mr. Burns argued that since the application of learned techniques increases your win rate in poker, it must be defined as a game of skill.

University of Denver professor Dr. Robert Hannum testified in Burns' defense claiming poker is not a game of chance referencing a computer simulation that showed skilled players winning 960 million times out of one billion over non-skilled players.

Dr. Hannum also testified in a similar case in Colorado where the defendant was acquitted.

His testimony was subsequently stricken by a higher court and that decision is currently being appealed in the Colorado Supreme Court.

Susquehanna University professor Matthew Rousu also testified in the Burns trial that poker is a game of skill.

After two hours of deliberation, a 12-person jury disagreed, finding Burns guilty on all counts Thursday.

The local district attorney said he would not seek jail time and Burns is planning to appeal.

Visit PokerListings.com

Online Poker Warrants to be Unsealed as Judge Sides with Gambling911

In breaking news out of the Southern District of New York, Judge Laura Swain has sided with Costigan Media, the parent company of Gambling911, and ordered the warrants and affidavits associated with the seizure of over $30 million in funds destined for online poker players to be unsealed.

Swain submitted 14 pages in support of Costigan Media and the online poker community. In Tuesday’s ruling, she decreed, “The Court is required to order disclosure absent compelling reasons to deny access and even then must employ the least restrictive means of doing so.” Several sections of the warrants and affidavits are redacted, while the complete versions will remain under seal. In addition, Judge Swain mandated, “The Government is directed to make a report to the Court… as to the status of the relevant investigative and seizure activities, within 120 days… and in any event within seven calendar days of any occurrence that obviates the need for continued redaction.”

Interactive Media Entertainment and Gaming Association (iMEGA) Chairman Joe Brennan told Poker News Daily why Judge Swain’s ruling on Tuesday was groundbreaking: “Costigan Media was afforded the same right of access that the New York Times and Washington Post sometimes receive. The Department of Justice has to report back to the Court on an ongoing basis in order to determine whether the remaining information can be released.” On what information was axed from the warrants and affidavits before they were made public, Brennan speculated, “It’s more than likely names of people who are cooperating witnesses or the targets of investigation.”

Poker News Daily has obtained a copy of the affidavit sworn to by FBI Special Agent Dana Conte for the seizure of funds located in a Wells Fargo branch in California. It reads, “There is probable cause to believe that the Defendant Account Services contains property involved in actual or attempted money laundering transactions… In addition, there is probable cause to believe that the Defendant Account contains property that constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to the operation of an illegal gambling business.”

The affidavit reveals that the FBI has been tracking “illegal internet gambling businesses” since 2006. The target sites offer online poker, sports betting, and casino games. A six-page section outlining the issuing of payment checks and funds transfers was marked out. Conte’s document concludes with, “I also respectfully request that this Affidavit be sealed until further order of the Court, so as to not jeopardize the investigation of this case.” Conte swore to the affidavit on June 2nd. The document was signed by Judge Theodore Katz, who then ordered it sealed until further notice.

The affidavit filed by Conte relating to funds held in a Union Bank branch discusses the Wells Fargo seizure that took place three weeks prior. On the offshore internet gambling outfits, Conte comments, “Although these gambling businesses are based offshore, the vast majority of their customers are in the United States. Consequently, the internet gambling businesses necessarily rely on the United States financial system to move funds.” Once again, a six-page section was redacted from the record. The Union Bank affidavit was filed on June 24th, 12 days after the actual seizure occurred, and signed by Judge Henry Pitman.

Brennan explained that attorneys for Costigan Media will review the redacted documents and can appeal: “They could appeal to have the documents fully released. Their legal team will take a look at it and decide.” Each affidavit is 13 pages long; half is redacted.

Judge Swain had originally indicated that she would release a decision on the motion to unseal the records last week after lawyers for both sides debated the issue on July 27th. On Thursday, Costigan Media issued a letter to Judge Swain outlining the indictment of Account Services’ Douglas Rennick on bank fraud, money laundering, and illegal gambling charges.

Dusty Schmidt (Leatherass) Drops USGA Lawsuit

Poker News Daily has learned that Dusty Schmidt, known in the online poker world as “Leatherass,” will drop his lawsuit against the United States Golf Association (USGA). He will likely play professional golf and continue his poker career.

A preliminary injunction originally scheduled for Monday, July 13th was delayed one day. The U.S. District Court in Portland, Oregon heard arguments as to why Schmidt should have his amateur status reinstated after USGA officials revoked it due to his now-infamous poker/golf challenge. The prop bet focused on whether anyone could defeat Schmidt over 72 holes of golf and 10 heads-up poker matches. No poker player or golf pro took Schmidt up on his challenge. However, the USGA still revoked his amateur status. Schmidt’s challenge was worth $1 million.

Schmidt told Poker News Daily on Wednesday, “I lost the preliminary injunction on July 14th. I didn’t lose it because I was in the wrong from a golf rules perspective. The judge gave the impression that what the USGA did to me was not right. But from a legal perspective, I did not have a strong enough legal remedy for him to rule in my favor. He equated it to a church excommunicating a member unfairly and there not necessarily being a legal remedy under which a judge can force the church to reinstate that member.”

The USGA’s website has a section devoted to gambling that reads, “The definition of an amateur golfer provides that an amateur golfer is one who plays the game as a non-remunerative and non-profit-making sport. When gambling motives are introduced, problems can arise which threaten the integrity of the game.” Promotions designed to “create cash prizes” are frowned upon by the USGA, which is located in Far Hills, New Jersey and serves as golf’s governing body in the United States and Mexico.

According to the Oregonian, a trial date in Schmidt’s lawsuit was set for September 22nd. He candidly told the Northwest news outlet, “The USGA is pretty ingeniously designed. The way their rules are set up, they’re almost impenetrable from a legal perspective. I don’t think I could win with O.J.’s lawyers. No matter what angle you tried to go for, they had the loophole covered. There was just no way.” His amateur status was officially revoked in mid-June after an e-mail received three days earlier cautioned Schmidt that participating in the challenge could jeopardize his amateur status.

What’s left for Schmidt now that playing golf as an amateur is no longer an option? The golfer and poker player told Poker News Daily, “At this point, I am going to continue to work with my instructor, two-time PGA tour winner Brian Henninger, and when the time is right, likely make the decision to reenter pro golf.” According to stats posted on PGA.com, Henninger has over $3.3 million in lifetime earnings from PGA events, including 44 finishes in the Top 25. His wins came in the Deposit Guaranty Golf Classic in 1994 and the Southern Farm Bureau Classic five years later.

In an article that appeared in July, the Associated Press noted that the USGA gave Schmidt the green light to reapply for amateur status, but “the process wasn’t timely enough because of the registration fees he’d already paid to compete in events over the summer.” In a July interview, Schmidt told Poker News Daily why maintaining amateur status was vital: “They have no professional events here [in Oregon]. I have a baby girl on the way and want to enjoy playing competitive golf close to home. If I have to play only in professional events, I’ll be forced to go on the road. I have no opportunity to play competitive golf here.”

Harlem Globetrotters, Miss America May Join Tiffany Michelle on Amazing Race

According to an article that appeared this week in The Examiner, two members of the Harlem Globetrotters basketball team and Miss America 2004 may join poker players Tiffany Michelle and Maria Ho on Season 15 of the CBS reality show “Amazing Race.”

Poker News Daily can confirm that Tiffany Michelle is among the cast for the 15th cycle of the reality series, citing anonymous sources inside the industry. Her rumored partner is Maria Ho, who Reality Fan Forum snapped a picture of at Los Angeles International Airport on the day that “Amazing Race” filming allegedly began. In the image, she did not appear to be donning a backpack (as is customary for “Amazing Race” teams); instead, she was pulling a suitcase. Michelle and Ho represent the last women standing in the 2008 and 2007 World Series of Poker (WSOP) Main Events, respectively.

The Examiner speculates that Harlem Globetrotters members Nate “Big Easy” Lofton and Herbert “Flight Time” Lang are members of the “Amazing Race” cast. Lang attended Centenary College in Louisiana and wears #4 for the showcase basketball team. His biography found on the Harlem Globetrotters website appropriately reads, “He is a self-proclaimed reality TV junkie… What Flight Time likes about reality TV is that, even though he knows parts are staged and scripted for dramatic effect, ‘After a certain amount of time, you really get to see what people are like.’” Lang was roped into reality television after catching an episode of CBS staple “Survivor.”

Lofton attended Southeast Louisiana and grew up in New Orleans. His biography notes, “His gregarious personality and thunderous dunks entertain Globetrotter fans young and old.” A total of 26 players make up the current roster of the Harlem Globetrotters, which showcase unusual basketball skills at venues around the world. Several members of the team, including Lang, appeared on the ABC reality series “The Bachelorette” in May. The Globetrotters challenged the seven remaining bachelors to a pick-up game of basketball, with bachelorette Jillian Harris looking on intently. “The Bachelorette” wrapped up on Monday night with Harris riding off into the sunset with Ed Swiderski.

Joining Lang, Lofton, Michelle, and Ho will likely be Miss America 2004, Ericka Dunlap. The Examiner notes that “Amazing Race” has featured pageant winners before, as Dustin-Leigh Konzelman and Kandice Pelletier competed as part of Season 10 and All-Stars. Dunlap hails from Florida; the reigning Miss America is Katie Stern, a native of Indiana. No indication was given as to who will partner with Dunlap for “Amazing Race.”

An entry appearing on Wikipedia adds that two newscasters from the television network C-SPAN will also take part in “Amazing Race” when the 15th season kicks off in September. The show pits teams of two against each other in a race around the world. Along the way, they’ll complete various challenges as part of “Detours” (a choice between two tasks, each with its own pros and cons) and “Road Blocks” (a task that only one team member can perform). Each leg typically consists of one Detour and one Road Block; many of the legs end with the last team arriving at the “Pit Stop” being eliminated.

“Amazing Race” will once again air on Sunday nights, debuting on September 27th for two hours. The popular reality program follows CBS News program “60 Minutes” and will serve as the lead-in for the new drama “Three Rivers.” “Amazing Race” is an Emmy-winning reality show whose reigning champions are lawyers and siblings Tammy and Victor. In seasons past, the top prize has been $1 million and to date, no “celebrity” installment of “Amazing Race” has taken place.

Other poker players who have appeared on major reality shows include Annie Duke, who finished as the runner-up to comedian Joan Rivers on the second season of “Celebrity Apprentice.” In addition, Bodog pro Jean-Robert Bellande competed on “Survivor: China,” the 15th cycle of the cornerstone CBS show. Bellande was the eighth player voted out of “Survivor: China” and served as a member of the jury.

Motion in Online Poker Seizure May Be Decided Next Week

The motion by Costigan Media to unseal the warrants and affidavits associated with the seizure of over $30 million in online poker funds may be ruled on next week. Lawyers for the parent company of Gambling911 and the U.S. Government took to a New York courtroom on Monday.

The funds in question belonged to a Wells Fargo branch in San Francisco and were part of a seizure that affected over 24,000 online poker players. Costigan Media’s motion notes, “Although the warrant was issued a month ago and although the funds are now safely under the control of the government and in no danger of dissipation, the affidavit submitted in support of the warrant still remains under seal. So do any supporting documents relating to this Court’s decision to seal the warrant application.” FBI Special Agent Dana Conte swore to the affidavit, while Magistrate Judge Theodore Katz issued the warrant.

Interactive Media Entertainment and Gaming Association (iMEGA) Executive Director Joe Brennan, who spoke to Costigan Media representatives following Monday’s hearing, told Poker News Daily, “The judge had a hard time understanding why she should keep a warrant sealed after it’s been served. She said that she could understand the Government not wanting to reveal names of informants, but other than that, she didn’t understand why it should be kept sealed.” Following the hearing, attorneys for the U.S. Government met with the judge for an hour and 15 minutes behind closed doors. A decision should be handed down next week.

Many in the industry have expressed concern about the contents of the warrants and affidavits. However, according to Brennan, they are important in order to prevent future seizures by the Southern District of New York and other bodies: “The Government has seized $40 million from payment processors, but it’s actually online poker players’ money. No one knows why the Government did it. I think the players would want to know why their money has been seized. It’s better to know if the Southern District of New York will go after more money.”

Costigan Media, which owns the popular website Gambling911, filed a motion to open the warrants and affidavits associated with the seizure citing First Amendment rights. Brennan explained, “After a warrant is served, it’s supposed to be public record. The Government wants to keep it secret for some reason. That’s a violation of everyone’s rights.” Costigan Media’s motion cites cases involving other media outlets such as the Baltimore Sun, New York Times, Newsday, and Gannett, the latter of which publishes 84 daily newspapers in the United States.

At the helm of Costigan Media is Chris Costigan, who was upbeat following yesterday’s hearing. Brennan noted that the judge did not look down upon Gambling911 bringing a complaint under the First Amendment. Instead, she carefully tried to ascertain why the Government would want to keep documents under wraps. Brennan revealed, “The fact that the judge did not look down at Costigan Media doing business as Gambling911 was encouraging. Instead, she thought, ‘I have a media outlet that is making a First Amendment application and am taking them very seriously.’”

The United States Government cited “law enforcement concerns” as a contributing factor to keeping the seal on the warrants and affidavits. It also charged that First Amendment rights do not apply to seizure warrant applications. Now, it will be up to the judge in the case to decide if the reasons for the online poker funds seizure in early June will be brought into the public spotlight.

Stay tuned to Poker News Daily for more information.

<i>Rounders 2</i> a reality?

"Everybody would probably come back," Rounders star Matt Damon told PokerListings. "The actors all had a really good time working together. I know Edward would want to do it; we had a blast working together. [Director] John Dahl I'm sure would like to do it. Maybe someday it will happen.

"The only reason to do a movie like that would be if we had a great idea. If the two writers suddenly said eureka! We have a great idea. Then everyone involved would be interested in exploring it."

According to one half of the David Levien and Brian Koppleman writing team, who penned both Rounders and the casino caper flick Oceans 13, that "eureka" moment may not be far off.

"We've been concentrating on Rounders 2 lately; Ideas are percolating," Levien told PokerListings. "It's great to know that all of the original players want to come back and do another one."

The Hollywood rumor mill recently had Leonardo DiCaprio set to star in a Rounders sequel using a Levien and Koppleman script based on online casinos.

Levien confirmed that project is in the works, but its association to Rounders is circumstantial at best.

"We did just set up a project centering on the world of offshore online casinos with Leonardo attached," Levien said. "It's a little ways down the road, but we've started researching."

"It's a great world. Some of the countries where online casinos are based are like the new version of the Wild West, and with so much money on the line there is lots of drama attached."

The two writers just seem drawn to the world of poker and gambling.

"Vegas, the poker world, the casino environment, and the characters that gravitate around them are endlessly fascinating to us," Levien said.

"We've always been interested in poker players who develop these skills and literally live by them; putting their money on the table and living or dying by how good they are."

Rounders is hands down the most popular and influential poker movie ever made.

It's been quoted, impersonated and dissected at more poker tables and online forums than any other film. Those discussions often center on how the movie was written and why these two writers picked poker as the setting for their first feature film.

Levien says it was the game itself that that drew them in.

"Brian and I had been working on the rough beginnings of a screenplay idea about two friends, and deciding what to do with one's life, and we weren't sure exactly what world we were going to set it in," he explained.

"Then Brian called me at about three in the morning and said 'I just lost all my money at an underground poker club. It was awesome. We've got to set the movie here.'

"The next night we went, and kept going back, playing at clubs all over the city every night for a year.  We read all the available important poker books too, and began writing the script during the mornings."

One of the underground poker clubs in question was New York's famed Mayfair Club, home court to Dan Harrington, Howard Lederer, Erik Seidel and a host of colorful characters.

Speculation regarding the various characters in the movie and who they were based on has run rampant since the film's 1998 release.

It has even been claimed the movie was based on actor/comedian Norm MacDonald and although he occasionally played at Mayfair, Levien says Rounders really had nothing to do with him.

However, he did confirm rumors that the "Teddy KGB" character was based on a player known as "Eddie KGB," and that "Joey Knish" was actually based on a rounder named "Joel Bagels," but he squashed all speculation regarding Damon's character "Mike McDermott."

"Brian had just gone to law school at night, but didn't want to practice law, so we got the idea: What if something that seemed conventionally wrong, like poker playing, was really the main character's destiny, and something usually considered proper, like being a lawyer, wasn't the right choice," he said.

For Rounders biggest fans, the most frequently argued question has always regarded what Teddy KGB was holding in the film's final hand.

Unfortunately, Levien and Koppleman still refuse to end that debate.

"That's probably the most asked question in regard to the movie, but it's something we never answer," Levien said.

Visit PokerListings.com

Tiffany Michelle, Maria Ho May Compete on Amazing Race

Poker News Daily can confirm that Ultimate Bet Star Player Tiffany Michelle will compete on the upcoming season of the CBS reality series “Amazing Race,” according to anonymous sources inside the industry. The show debuts on September 27th at 8:00pm ET following “60 Minutes.” Michelle’s partner, according to Bluff Magazine and various television news outfits, is Maria Ho.

The upcoming season is the 15th for the “Amazing Race,” which pits teams of two against each other for a race around the world – literally. Last season, contestants traveled to diverse destinations that included Switzerland, Germany, Austria, Romania, Russia, India, Thailand, and China before crossing the finish line at the King Kamehameha Golf Club in Maui, Hawaii. Michelle and Ho represent the last women standing in the 2008 and 2007 World Series of Poker (WSOP) Main Events, respectively. Michelle gained notoriety last year by calling the clock during a hand she wasn’t involved in, an act that was criticized by tablemate and November Nine member Craig Marquis.

An e-mail sent to Michelle seeking comment about the rumors resulted in an auto-response that read, “I’ll be off shooting for the next month, till mid August, and may be away from my computer and out of touch during that time.” An image that appeared on RealityFanForum.com showed Ho at Los Angeles International Airport allegedly for the start of “Amazing Race.” In a blog entry dated June 27th, Michelle indicated that she would not defend her title of Last Woman Standing in the Main Event: “It’d have to be something pretty big to deter me from the WSOP Championship Event this year and trust me, IT IS! I can’t disclose much right now, but I’ll be leaving the country to film a project for a month and it conflicts with the Main Event.”

In May, Jean-Robert Bellande, who appeared on CBS’ “Survivor: China” in 2007, posted on the online poker forum TwoPlusTwo that “two hot poker girls” were wanted for an “upcoming reality show.” Bellande, a Bodog pro, noted that the ideal candidate is “a respected pro, young, hot, single, [and] engaging.” The Bad Boy of Poker suggested Kristy Gazes and Team PokerStars Pro member Vanessa Rousso, although the latter is engaged to Chad Brown. Last season on the “Amazing Race,” former NFL cheerleaders Jaime and Cara finished as the runner-ups to siblings and lawyers Tammy and Victor.

A representative from Ultimate Bet told Poker News Daily, “I know Tiffany is away working on a project, but unfortunately that is all we know at this point. We can’t comment on any such rumors.” Michelle signed with the Tokwiro-owned online poker room one year ago, joining a Team UB roster that includes Adam “Roothlus” Levy, Brandon Cantu, Gary “debo34” Debernardi, “Hollywood” Dave Stann, Matt “mattg1983” Graham, Michael Binger, Mark “P0ker H0″ Kroon, Scott Ian, and Shawn “westtexasman” Rice. The site’s two main faces are 11-time WSOP bracelet winner Phil Hellmuth and “Celebrity Apprentice” runner-up Annie Duke.

At the Dream Team Poker event held at Caesars Palace in March, Michelle and Ho joined forces to bring Team Yo Mama to life. The all-female squad also featured Lacey Jones. No female team has ever won “Amazing Race,” which first aired in 2001. That season, contestants traveled 35,000 miles around the world, led by Rob and Brennan. For its 11th season, favorites from the first 10 cycles of “Amazing Race” convened for a special All-Stars edition. Notable teams included Rob and Amber of “Survivor” fame and Season 7 winners Uchenna and Joyce, who were eliminated at the end of the ninth leg.

During each episode, teams compete in “Detours,” which is a choice between two tasks, each with its own pros and cons. In addition, they’ll stumble upon “Road Blocks,” which are challenges that only one team member can perform. Each “Detour” and “Road Block” typically focuses on the local culture, giving the show a unique flair. New Zealander Phil Keoghan serves as its host and the show will return to its Sunday night timeslot on September. “Amazing Race” serves as the lead-in for the new CBS drama “Three Rivers.”

Third Circuit Court of Appeals Hears iMEGA UIGEA Case

On Tuesday, lawyers from the Interactive Media Entertainment and Gaming Association (iMEGA) argued in front of the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. The objective: prove that the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) is unconstitutional.

iMEGA’s case was the second on the docket on Tuesday in the Third Circuit behind a legal battle over whether a Yeshiva school could be constructed on the grounds of a synagogue based on zoning rights. One of the central issues discussed by the trade organization and counsel  for the United States Attorney General’s Office was where a bet placed online actually occurs. iMEGA Executive Director Joe Brennan explained, “We argued that the bet took place in another country like Costa Rica. When a person enters into a bet, it comes from an account already placed on the site.” However, it could be argued that bets originate on a person’s computer, on a server, or somewhere along the way in cyberspace.

Also at the forefront of the debate on Tuesday was whether iMEGA had standing to sue, something Brennan noted was preserved at the District Court level. iMEGA has online poker sites and individual players as members. Brennan recalled, “There was a ruling from the Third Circuit that concluded whether or not third parties could come forward if members were harmed, but [U.S. Attorney General counsel] Nicholas Bagley wasn’t familiar with it.” On his overall impressions, Brennan admitted, “It’s tough to tell. The three judge panel spent a lot of time with us. They didn’t spend as much time with the Government’s attorneys.”

Also questioned was whether it would have been advantageous for iMEGA to find an internet gambler who was harmed to appear in court. It’s a similar quandary that the Poker Players Alliance (PPA) has found itself in with regards to the online poker funds seizure in New York. In essence, anyone who stepped forward would be required to testify under oath that they played online poker. Brennan noted, “We said that, per the language of the statute, a person would essentially incriminate themselves in order to challenge the UIGEA. While there are no criminal sanctions, there are civil penalties for players.”

Judges Dolores Sloviter, Thomas Ambro, and Kent Jordan listened to attorneys for iMEGA and the Federal Government on Tuesday. The panel will now deliberate and return one of a wide variety of verdicts. One of the questions posed concerned the status of bills to license the industry in the United States and delay the implementation of the UIGEA’s regulations. Both were introduced on May 6th and referred to the House Financial Services Committee. HR 2266, the Internet Gambling Regulation, Consumer Protection, and Enforcement Act, is up to 40 co-sponsors. HR 2267, the Reasonable Prudence in Regulation Act, has attracted 23 co-sponsors. Neither has been scheduled for mark-up or discussion on the floor of the House of Representatives. One possible outcome is the Third Circuit deferring a resolution until Frank’s bills are acted on.

Many in the industry are now scrambling to ascertain when the Third Circuit will hand down a decision. Brennan revealed that the court’s average turnaround time is three months and iMEGA does not expect to hear back in the next 30 days. At the District Court level, the organization was left in the dark for nearly six months.

In the meantime, iMEGA will turn its attention to the Commonwealth of Kentucky, where briefs were filed to the state’s Supreme Court in May. To open the year, the Kentucky Court of Appeals in Louisville overturned a lower court ruling by a two to one margin and asserted that the Commonwealth did not have jurisdiction to seize 141 internet gambling domain names. The State quickly appealed. There has been no word on whether the Kentucky Supreme Court will take the case.

Visit the official website of iMEGA.

Judges for iMEGA UIGEA Challenge Announced

The three judge panel from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals that will hear the Interactive Media Entertainment and Gaming Association (iMEGA) argue why the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) is unconstitutional has been named. The Third Circuit will hear the case on July 7th at 10:00am ET.

At the District Court level, Judge Mary L. Cooper disagreed with many of iMEGA’s reasons why the UIGEA should be declared unconstitutional. However, she granted the trade organization standing to sue, prompting an appeal to the Third Circuit. Now, over a year later, lawyers for iMEGA will receive their day in court. Democratic Presidents appointed two of the three judges named to the Court of Appeals panel, leaving many in the industry optimistic that the UIGEA challenge may be successful.

President Jimmy Carter appointed Judge Dolores Sloviter to the Third Circuit in 1979. She is the veteran of the panel and served as the Third Circuit’s Chief Judge from 1991 to 1998. iMEGA Executive Director Joe Brennan told Poker News Daily, “I think this is an interesting panel. Judge Sloviter was part of the panel that blocked the Communications Decency Act, which is a landmark case in internet law.” The panel in question ruled that the Act, which dealt with internet pornography, was unconstitutional under the First Amendment.

President Bill Clinton appointed Judge Thomas Ambro to the Third Circuit in 1999 and Congress approved him one year later. Brennan noted, “Judge Ambro’s best known decisions have consistently upheld First Amendment rights and civil liberties.” Besides First Amendment rights, iMEGA notes that the UIGEA should be “void for vagueness.” Online poker players know all too well that the UIGEA failed to identify what activities are permissible. In response, credit card companies such as Visa and MasterCard have blocked legal online lottery purchases in New Hampshire and North Dakota. To iMEGA, this “over-blocking” is an example of the shortcomings of the 2006 law.

The third and final judge to make up the panel that will hear lawyers for iMEGA and the U.S. Department of Justice debate the constitutionality of the UIGEA is Kent Jordan, appointed by George W. Bush. On whether any residual influence from the Bush Administration will affect Jordan’s views, Brennan commented, “Even Judge Jordan, with his extensive corporate law background, may potentially recognize the undue burden that UIGEA places on banks and credit card companies. Despite assumptions the industry may make on his being nominated by President Bush, who signed the UIGEA, or his religious background, I think this is a good panel.”

Taking the case on behalf of iMEGA is Eric Bernstein, who argued the case in front of Judge Cooper, and Stephen Saltzburg, former Deputy Attorney General of the United States. Nicholas Bagley and Jacqueline Coleman will represent the U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Trade Commission, and Federal Reserve, who collectively serve as the defendants in the case. In a press release distributed by iMEGA, Brennan noted that he is looking forward to an objective panel: “This law will finally have to stand on its own two feet in court, free from politics and all other outside influences. We feel very confident that when the judges take a look at the law, they will see just how defective it is and they will overturn it.”

The organization is fresh off a victory in Minnesota, where the state’s Department of Public Safety rescinded orders to 11 of the world’s largest internet service providers that called for the blockage of 200 internet gambling domain names. iMEGA filed suit to stop the action, effectively ending the Department of Public Safety’s attempts at censorship. If successful, USA-friendly sites like Bodog, Full Tilt Poker, and Players Only would have been inaccessible by Minnesota residents. In addition, a host of online poker rooms that do not accept U.S. customers would also have been blocked.

Stay tuned to Poker News Daily for the latest from the iMEGA legal challenge.

Celebrity Apprentice to Return Mid-Season, Retain 9:00pm ET Time Slot

NBC’s hit reality show, Celebrity Apprentice, will return mid-season in 2010, according to a recent article that appeared in the Chicago Tribune. The show’s second season, and eighth overall, saw poker pro Annie Duke reach the finals and square off against comedian Joan Rivers.

The finale of Celebrity Apprentice, which played out on Sunday, May 10th, averaged 8.73 million viewers, according to TV Guide. It ran against stiff competition, as the season finale of CBS’ Amazing Race aired from 8:00pm to 9:00pm ET and drew 10.43 million. Lawyers Tammy and Victor earned the “W” on that show’s 14th installment. Also airing during the first of three hours of the Celebrity Apprentice season finale was Extreme Makeover: Home Edition, which generated 8.2 million viewers. During the 9:00pm ET hour, the Donald Trump-led reality series had to contend against both Cold Case and Desperate Housewives. The two shows saw 11.78 and 12.13 million viewers, respectively, tune in.

The final hour of Celebrity Apprentice, which included about a half-hour of live programming from New York City, attracted an audience of 10.24 million. It “trumped” the season finales of The Unit and Brothers and Sisters, outdrawing both shows by at least 500,000. Celebrity Apprentice ran during the season from 9:00pm to 11:00pm ET, being truncated to one hour on just one occasion, which was for the series premiere of Southland, a drama from the creators of E.R. According to the Tribune, Dateline NBC will occupy the 7:00pm to 8:00pm ET time slot in early 2010. It will be followed by The Marriage Ref, which airs from 8:00pm to 9:00pm ET. Celebrity Apprentice will then be beamed into homes around the country for two hours.

In its Fall 2009 schedule, NBC will air Sunday Night Football in the time slot previously occupied by Celebrity Apprentice. Its pre-game show, Football Night in America, will run from 7:00pm to 8:20pm ET, with kickoff of the feature game occurring shortly thereafter. Al Michaels and Cris Collinsworth will have the call every Sunday. Collinsworth replaces football legend John Madden, who recently retired. Celebrity Apprentice fans may also have to wait until after the 2010 Winter Olympics, which will emanate from Vancouver and air between February 12th and 28th.

Duke raised over $730,000 for her charity, Refugees International, during NBC’s second season of Celebrity Apprentice. She raised $460,000 in the final episode alone, which challenged Duke and Rivers to hold a silent auction featuring celebrity experiences prior to a performance of the Cirque du Soleil show Wintuk. The task also entailed incorporating the event’s corporate sponsor, Kodak. In the end, the two finalists were judged on five criteria, with Rivers winning Kodak integration, celebrities in attendance, and overall guest experience. Duke won by a 3:1 margin in money raised and also won charity incorporation.

In a recently blog, 10-time World Series of Poker (WSOP) bracelet winner Doyle Brunson remarked, “The Celebrity Apprentice is over. What a joke! If Donald Trump was really hiring someone, who do you think he would pick? I think that when Joan Rivers threatened to not come back, Trump assured her she would be the winner.” Time will only tell if the third installment of Celebrity Apprentice will feature a poker player. Duke is one of several to appear on a major reality series. In 2007, Bodog Poker pro Jean-Robert Bellande appeared on CBS’ Survivor: China. Bellande was the eighth person voted out and became the second member of the jury. In Survivor, ousted contestants choose the winner of the $1 million first place prize. Flight attendant Todd Herzog took down Survivor: China, besting Courtney Yates and Amanda Kimmel in a three-way final tribal council.

Duke will re-enter the poker spotlight during the 2009 WSOP, which kicks off next week from the Rio in Las Vegas. A $5,000 buy-in charity poker tournament benefiting Ante Up for Africa will take place on July 2nd in the Amazon Room and be televised by ESPN. Celebrity Apprentice contestants Dennis Rodman and Herschel Walker are both confirmed to appear in the event, which raises money for the victims of the crisis in Darfur. Ante Up for Africa was founded in 2006 by Duke, actor Don Cheadle, and Norman Epstein.